147
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Dupilumab Efficacy in Patients Stratified by Baseline Treatment Intensity and Lung Function

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 701-711 | Published online: 16 Dec 2020

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics by Baseline ICS Dose and FEV1% Predicted – ITT Population

Figure 1 Annualized rate of severe exacerbations over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ITT, intent-to-treat; LS, least squares; ppb, parts per billion; q2w, every 2 weeks.
Figure 1 Annualized rate of severe exacerbations over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Figure 2 Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Abbreviations: FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ITT, intent-to-treat; LS, least squares; ppb, parts per billion; q2w, every 2 weeks; SE, standard error.
Figure 2 Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Figure 3 Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Abbreviations: ACQ-5, 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ITT, intent-to-treat; LS, least squares; ppb, parts per billion; q2w, every 2 weeks; SE, standard error.
Figure 3 Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Figure 4 Change from baseline in AQLQ score over 52 weeks in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Abbreviations: AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ITT, intent-to-treat; LS, least squares; ppb, parts per billion; q2w, every 2 weeks; SE, standard error.
Figure 4 Change from baseline in AQLQ score over 52 weeks in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.

Figure 5 Median FeNO (ppb) during the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – exposed population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01 vs matched volume placebo (P-values based on change from baseline vs placebo).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ppb, parts per billion; q2w, every 2 weeks; SE, standard error.
Figure 5 Median FeNO (ppb) during the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – exposed population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01 vs matched volume placebo (P-values based on change from baseline vs placebo).