Figures & data
Table 1 Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics by Baseline ICS Dose and FEV1% Predicted – ITT Population
Figure 1 Annualized rate of severe exacerbations over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.
![Figure 1 Annualized rate of severe exacerbations over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.](/cms/asset/e2e6fe0d-acd1-47fb-9703-3c7bd5ca01b1/djaa_a_12166809_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.
![Figure 2 Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.](/cms/asset/87aa04e5-4627-46de-b0ef-36430ebeeeb5/djaa_a_12166809_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.
![Figure 3 Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score over the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.](/cms/asset/90e6a119-d7d9-421e-90fc-e5a1ce0845b8/djaa_a_12166809_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Change from baseline in AQLQ score over 52 weeks in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.
![Figure 4 Change from baseline in AQLQ score over 52 weeks in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, and (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – ITT population. **P<0.01; *P<0.05 vs matched volume placebo.](/cms/asset/593ba5d8-65bc-4e1c-a85e-4b5bbef894ff/djaa_a_12166809_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Median FeNO (ppb) during the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – exposed population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01 vs matched volume placebo (P-values based on change from baseline vs placebo).
![Figure 5 Median FeNO (ppb) during the 52-week treatment period in patients with (A) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (B) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL, (C) medium-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted ≥60–90% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO, (D) high-dose ICS and FEV1% predicted <60% and ≥150 eosinophils/µL or ≥25 ppb FeNO at baseline – exposed population. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01 vs matched volume placebo (P-values based on change from baseline vs placebo).](/cms/asset/7aec74e7-f4ef-4e97-965b-91e7a2905f24/djaa_a_12166809_f0005_c.jpg)