130
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

What is the Best Way to Diagnose Possible Asthma Patients with Negative Bronchodilator Reversibility Tests?

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 113-122 | Received 01 Sep 2023, Accepted 08 Feb 2024, Published online: 21 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1 Material and method: Demographic characteristics, physical examinations, pulmonary function tests, asthma control tests, quality of life questionnaires were performed at the first application of the participants (Visit 0) who consented to participate in the study. PEF meters were provided to each of them, and their usage was explained. A chart was given to the participants for follow-up standardization. They were asked to perform PEF follow-up for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, the participants were given mBPT appointments (Visit 1). According to the patients whose results were evaluated, treatment was started according to the recommendations of the GINA guideline. They were called for control after 1 month (Visit 2). Physical examination, pulmonary function tests, quality of life questionnaires, and asthma control tests were renewed and recorded.

Figure 1 Material and method: Demographic characteristics, physical examinations, pulmonary function tests, asthma control tests, quality of life questionnaires were performed at the first application of the participants (Visit 0) who consented to participate in the study. PEF meters were provided to each of them, and their usage was explained. A chart was given to the participants for follow-up standardization. They were asked to perform PEF follow-up for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, the participants were given mBPT appointments (Visit 1). According to the patients whose results were evaluated, treatment was started according to the recommendations of the GINA guideline. They were called for control after 1 month (Visit 2). Physical examination, pulmonary function tests, quality of life questionnaires, and asthma control tests were renewed and recorded.

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Features of the Study Group

Table 2 Clinical Features of the Study Group

Table 3 Basal Spirometry and Survey Data of the Study Group (Visit 0)

Table 4 Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis That Examines Various Parameters to Predict Asthma Diagnosis

Table 5 Correlation Rates Between Patients with BPT Positivity and Different Cut-off Values of PEF Variability

Figure 2 Results; BPT alone was positive in 10 of 30 asthma cases. Both mBPT positivity and PEF variability were positive in 16 cases. Only four out of 30 patients were diagnosed with asthma based on positive PEF variability. 20 patients were evaluated as non-specific respiratory symptoms. No treatment was given. At the end of the 1st month, 17 of the 30 treated patients attended visit 2. 13 patients did not attend visit 2. Treatment response of 17 patients was evaluated.

Figure 2 Results; BPT alone was positive in 10 of 30 asthma cases. Both mBPT positivity and PEF variability were positive in 16 cases. Only four out of 30 patients were diagnosed with asthma based on positive PEF variability. 20 patients were evaluated as non-specific respiratory symptoms. No treatment was given. At the end of the 1st month, 17 of the 30 treated patients attended visit 2. 13 patients did not attend visit 2. Treatment response of 17 patients was evaluated.

Table 6 1st Month Control Results of Those Who Started Treatment with Asthma Diagnosis (n=17)