58
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 129-137 | Published online: 04 Jul 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1 PRISMA diagram for SLR.

Abbreviations: ABRs, annualized bleed rates; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; rAHF-PFM, antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method; SLR, systematic literature review.
Figure 1 PRISMA diagram for SLR.

Figure 2 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs rAHF-PFM.

Note: Data from Valentino et al.Citation17
Abbreviations: ABRs, annualized bleed rates; rAHF-PFM, antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method.
Figure 2 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs rAHF-PFM.

Figure 3 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs rAHF-PFM.

Notes: *P<0.05. Data from Tarantino et al.Citation16
Abbreviations: ABRs, annualized bleed rates; rAHF-PFM, antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method.
Figure 3 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs rAHF-PFM.

Table 1 Outcomes for BAY 81-8973 (first 6-month) vs rAHF-PFM

Figure 4 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs turoctocog alfa.

Notes: *P<0.05. Data from Lentz et al.Citation18
Abbreviation: ABRs, annualized bleed rates.
Figure 4 ABRs for BAY 81-8973 (1-year) vs turoctocog alfa.

Table 2 Outcomes for BAY 81-8973 (first 6-month) vs turoctocog alfa