111
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Direct oral anticoagulants for extended thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients: meta-analysis and risk/benefit assessment

, &
Pages 25-34 | Published online: 21 Feb 2018

Figures & data

Table 1 Study design and outcomes

Table 2 Patient demographics and clinical status

Figure 1 Meta-analysis results: efficacy outcomes.

Notes: Weights are from random effects analysis. risk ratio refers to the efficacy benefit of averting a VTE event when prophylacting with either DOACs or enoxaparin. risk ratio <1.00 with 95% CI <1.00 denotes that DOACs are prophylactically more efficacious, whereas risk ratio >1.00 with 95% CI >1.00 denotes that enoxaparin is prophylactically more efficacious than DOACs in averting a VTE. risk ratio with 95% CI limits 0.00< risk ratio estimate >1.00 denotes relative equivalence of DOAC and enoxaparin prophylaxis in averting VTE.
Abbreviations: DOAC, direct oral anti-coagulant; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Figure 1 Meta-analysis results: efficacy outcomes.

Figure 2 Meta-analysis results: safety outcomes.

Notes: Weights are from random effects analysis. risk ratio refers to the safety benefit of averting a bleeding event when prophylacting with either DOACs or enoxaparin. risk ratio <1.00 with 95% CI <1.00 denotes that DOACs are prophylactically more efficacious, whereas risk ratio>1.00 with 95% CI >1.00 denotes that enoxaparin is prophylactically more efficacious than DOACs in averting bleeding event. risk ratio with 95% CI limits 0.00< risk ratio estimate >1.00 denotes relative equivalence of DOAC and enoxaparin prophylaxis in averting bleeding events.
Abbreviation: DOAC, direct oral anti-coagulant.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis results: safety outcomes.

Table 3 Risk/benefit assessment for clinical outcomes with statistically significant results in the meta-analysis