Figures & data
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of 97 Patients
Table 2 Summary of Best Response
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS ((A) n=97), OS ((B) n=97), DOR ((C) n=76), and intrahepatic DOR ((D) n=79).
![Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS ((A) n=97), OS ((B) n=97), DOR ((C) n=76), and intrahepatic DOR ((D) n=79).](/cms/asset/acdc918f-aabb-4b78-aa92-3941cc679667/djhc_a_12295336_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier plots show percent OS categorized by (A) ALBI, (B) BMI, (C) High-risk type, (D) Metastasis, (E) Child-Pugh class, and (F) PD-1 agents, with numbers at risk shown below the graph.
![Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier plots show percent OS categorized by (A) ALBI, (B) BMI, (C) High-risk type, (D) Metastasis, (E) Child-Pugh class, and (F) PD-1 agents, with numbers at risk shown below the graph.](/cms/asset/32fd364e-4631-4559-8dc1-ca635d5db969/djhc_a_12295336_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Percentage changes from baseline. (A) Best percentage change from baseline in intrahepatic target lesion per RECIST 1.1. The dashed line at 30% change represents the partial response. (B) Best percentage change from baseline in intrahepatic target lesion per mRECIST. The dashed line at 30% change represents the partial response.
![Figure 4 Percentage changes from baseline. (A) Best percentage change from baseline in intrahepatic target lesion per RECIST 1.1. The dashed line at 30% change represents the partial response. (B) Best percentage change from baseline in intrahepatic target lesion per mRECIST. The dashed line at 30% change represents the partial response.](/cms/asset/2072fca1-6ccd-4b6c-bb73-e4e480c179da/djhc_a_12295336_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3 Univariable and Multivariable Analyses of Covariates Associated with PFS
Table 4 Univariable and Multivariable Analyses of Covariables Associated with OS
Table 5 Treatment-Related Adverse Events