Rampart of Health-Specific Leadership and Social Support of Colleagues to Overcome Burnout in an Emotionally Demanding Situations: The Mediating Role of Stress

Figures & data

Figure 1 Theoretical Study Model.

Table 1 Mean, Standard Deviations, Correlation and Alpha Values

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. Gender
2. Age			−0.13*
3. Education			−0.15*	−0.21**
4. Emotional Demands	2.52	0.83	−0.06	0.02	−0.10	(0.80)
5. Social Support Colleagues	3.75	0.73	0.04	0.06	0.02	−0.26**	(0.84)
6. Health-specific Leadership	3.56	0.56	0.05	0.03	0.23**	0.08	−0.05	(0.63)
7. Stress	2.59	0.76	−0.01	−0.14*	−0.15*	0.50**	−0.22**	−0.01	(0.82)
8. Burnout	2.75	0.86	0.01	−0.02	−0.08	0.48**	−0.16*	−0.04	0.72**	(0.93)

Notes: The alpha values are shown diagonally; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Table 2 Results of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Direct Relationships

Independent Variables	Mediator Stress		Outcome Variable Burnout
	Model I	Model II	Model I	Model II
Step 1 – Control Variables
Gender	−0.05	−0.01	−0.01	0.04
Age	−0.11	−0.13	−0.01	0.06
Education	−0.12	−0.06	−0.08	0.03
Step 2 – Main Effect
Emotional Demands		0.48**		0.15**
Social Support Colleagues		−0.09		−0.01
Health-specific Leadership		−0.02		−0.04
Stress				0.66**
R^2	0.03	0.29**	0.01	0.55**
∆ R^2		0.25**		0.54**

Note: **p < 0.01.

Table 3 Mediation Analysis

Relationships	Beta	SE	Confidence Interval
			LL UL
Emotional Demands → Stress → Burnout	0.33**	0.04	0.25 –- 0.43
Social Support Colleagues → Stress → Burnout	−0.19**	0.05	−0.28 –- −0.09
Health-specific Leadership → Stress → Burnout	−0.02	0.06	−0.15 –- 0.11

Data Sharing Statement

This will be provided on reasonable request.