Figures & data
Table 1 PCR primer structures and targets definition
Figure 1 Expression of Nf-kb in the liver of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 1 Expression of Nf-kb in the liver of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/551c045d-e6b6-46a1-95a3-6169b73ca663/djir_a_12198436_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2 The expression level of mRNA Nf-kb and Hif-1α in the liver of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%)
Figure 2 Expression of Hif-1α in the liver of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 2 Expression of Hif-1α in the liver of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/a14103de-b3c6-49a4-85f3-dff85d71c3fd/djir_a_12198436_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3 The serum IL-1β and spleen IL-10 levels in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%)
Figure 3 Serum IL-1β levels in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 3 Serum IL-1β levels in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/75b7716f-b7e2-4f9f-a119-e2d33dfd6626/djir_a_12198436_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 IL-10 production by spleen cells activated by Concanavalin A in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 4 IL-10 production by spleen cells activated by Concanavalin A in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/845c4389-7fec-4f87-b667-575d564e5bf5/djir_a_12198436_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 4 serum TGF-β level in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%)
Figure 5 TGF-β serum levels in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 5 TGF-β serum levels in rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/fd2af0f6-f4e2-4103-848b-6f2a62c67663/djir_a_12198436_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Morphological changes in the lungs of male Wistar rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration.
Notes: H&E staining. Original magnification: (A–H) 640×. (A) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, control group – few neutrophils in the field of view. (B) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, control group – few neutrophils in the field of view. (C) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 3 hours LPS – thickened interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia. (D) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 3 hours LPS – pronounced neutrophil infiltration in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (E) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 6 hours LPS – neutrophil infiltration in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (F) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 6 hours LPS – high number of neutrophils in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (G) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 24 hours LPS – interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia. (H) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 24 hours LPS – interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 6 Morphological changes in the lungs of male Wistar rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration.Notes: H&E staining. Original magnification: (A–H) 640×. (A) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, control group – few neutrophils in the field of view. (B) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, control group – few neutrophils in the field of view. (C) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 3 hours LPS – thickened interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia. (D) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 3 hours LPS – pronounced neutrophil infiltration in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (E) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 6 hours LPS – neutrophil infiltration in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (F) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 6 hours LPS – high number of neutrophils in interalveolar septa, hyperemia. (G) Rats tolerant to hypoxia, 24 hours LPS – interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia. (H) Rats susceptible to hypoxia, 24 hours LPS – interalveolar septa with neutrophils, hyperemia.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/328bc763-0ce5-4ea6-bdc6-ae134a7f8121/djir_a_12198436_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 The average number of neutrophils counted in ten high-power fields of view (25,000 µm2) per section in the interalveolar septa of the lungs of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).
Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.
Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
![Figure 7 The average number of neutrophils counted in ten high-power fields of view (25,000 µm2) per section in the interalveolar septa of the lungs of rats tolerant and susceptible to hypoxia after 3, 6 and 24 hours of LPS administration (Me; 25%–75%).Notes: In all groups there were 5 observations except the tolerant group after 24 hours of LPS injection, in which were 8. Statistical significance of differences (P-value) is determined by the Kruskal–Wallis method.Abbreviation: LPS, lipopolysaccharide.](/cms/asset/64cab751-7f84-4c23-bc97-d1c2a9188210/djir_a_12198436_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 5 summary of results