Figures & data
Figure 1 Flow chart of the study.
![Figure 1 Flow chart of the study.](/cms/asset/26bedc84-70f8-41e2-9e75-b333d683b6e7/djir_a_12159126_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Comparison of Base Information of Derivation and Validation Groups
Table 2 Weight and Score of Scoring Items in the New Scoring System (GOL)
Table 3 Relationship Between Clinical Characteristics and GOL Scores of Patients with Sepsis in the Derivation Group
Table 4 Univariate Analysis and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Between Survival and Death Groups in the Derivation Group
Figure 2 ROC curves of GOL, SOFA and APACHE II in the derivative group.
![Figure 2 ROC curves of GOL, SOFA and APACHE II in the derivative group.](/cms/asset/da11a2bb-83b6-4c57-a48d-667d4526db75/djir_a_12159126_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 SOFA (A) and APACHE II (B) levels in different OLG scores.
![Figure 3 SOFA (A) and APACHE II (B) levels in different OLG scores.](/cms/asset/c3289471-7a78-4976-9de7-f7b8c2842008/djir_a_12159126_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 The 28-day mortality (A), MV (B), and AICU (C) with different OLG scores.
![Figure 4 The 28-day mortality (A), MV (B), and AICU (C) with different OLG scores.](/cms/asset/88a23e65-9499-49e2-a61f-872dcf986c69/djir_a_12159126_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 5 Logistic Regression Analysis Regarding Correlations Between Clinical Outcomes and GOL
Figure 5 Decision curve analysis for the outcome of 28-day mortality. For clinically relevant threshold probabilities (above 18% and 43%), OLG was superior to APACHE II and SOFA, respectively.
![Figure 5 Decision curve analysis for the outcome of 28-day mortality. For clinically relevant threshold probabilities (above 18% and 43%), OLG was superior to APACHE II and SOFA, respectively.](/cms/asset/37e07ccf-a106-420a-9c18-78e9d7ff6a6b/djir_a_12159126_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 6 AUC Comparison of Adverse Outcome Prediction Based on GOL, APACHE II, and SOFA in Validation Cohort