Effect of a Feedforward Control Model on Nursing Attitudes in the Operating Room

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics Description and Comparison Between the Control Group and the Study Group

Characteristics	Control Group(n=108)	Study Group (n=108)	t-value	P-value
Age (years)	47.0±1.5	47.5±1.6	0.234	0.741
Gender (male/female, n)	68/40	69/39	2.000	0.157
Hospital stay (days)	19.0±1.9	19.5±1.2	0.333	0.659
Department			24.000	0.090
Orthopedics	42	43
Gynecology	22	23
Urology	18	19
Hepatobiliary surgery	10	9
ENT	10	9
Brain	6	5

Table 2 Nursing Quality (Points, )

Group	Number of Cases	Nursing Document Quality	Quality Control Inspection	Disinfection and Isolation	Nursing Safety Management
Control group	108	72.0±1.8	75.4±1.9	73.4±2.4	71.1±2.2
Study group	108	97.2±2.0	95.5±1.2	96.6±2.0	98.0±1.8
t	/	10.252	10.201	10.032	10.269
P	/	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05

Table 3 Nursing Error Behavior, Nursing Work Attitude Score (Points, )

Group	Number of Cases	Nursing Error Behavior Score	Nursing Work Attitude Score
Control group	108	13.2±1.0	14.0±1.2
Study group	108	19.4±1.8	19.0±2.0
t	/	10.062	10.056
P	/	<0.05	<0.05

Table 4 Occurrence of Potential Safety Hazards (Cases, %)

Group	Number of Cases	Unqualified Quality of the Operating Room Restricted Area	Wrong Surgical Sequence	Incomplete Surgical Instruments	Contamination of Histopathological Specimens	Incidence
Control group	108	3	2	3	4	11.1%
Study group	108	0	0	1	0	0.9%
χ^2	/	4.038	4.027	4.027	4.049	4.039
P	/	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05

Table 5 Nursing Satisfaction (Cases, %)

Group	Number of Cases	Satisfied	Basically Satisfied	Dissatisfied	Nursing Satisfaction
Control group	108	40	37	31	71.3%
Study group	108	60	41	7	93.5%
χ^2	/	4.208	4.049	4.241	4.159
P	/	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05

Data Sharing Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.