Assessing the Effectiveness of an E-Coaching Intervention in Improving Family Support for Individuals with Mental Disorders: A Quasi-Experimental Approach

Figures & data

Figure 1 Application e-coaching SIPANDAWA preview.

Table 1 Participant Characteristics

Variables	Intervention		Control
	N	%	N	%
Gender
Male	18	29.5	22	36.1
Female	43	70.5	39	63.9
Education
Higher education	3	4.9	3	4.9
Senior high school	29	47.6	18	29.5
Junior high school	29	47.6	40	65.6
Occupation
Public realm	22	34.1	31	50.8
Student	1	1.6	1	1.7
Domestic realm	38	62.3	29	37.5
Association with MDs
Child	4	6.6	2	3.3
Parent	9	14.8	35	57.4
Sibling	38	62.2	19	31.1
Spouse	6	9.8	2	3.3
Other	4	6.6	3	4.9

Table 2 Family Ability Evaluation

Family Ability	Intervention (n=61)		Control// (n=61)		T	ρ
	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Pre-test	50.26	2.75	50.44	2.35	0.389	0.698
Post-test 1	55.98	2.94	54.90	3.58	1.825	0.070
Post-test 2	63.85	3.07	60.84	3.29	5.237	0.000

Table 3 Confounding Impact Analysis Using ANCOVA

Source	Type III Sum of Squares	df	Mean Square	F	Sig.
Corrected Model	1035.892^a	7	147.985	37.025	0.000
Intercept	4361.367	1	4361.367	1.091E3	0.000
Age	0.870	1	0.870	0.218	0.642
Gender	4.533	1	4.533	1.134	0.289
Occupation	2.354	1	2.354	0.589	0.444
Education	504.512	1	504.512	126.225	0.000*
Relationship with MDs	0.799	1	0.799	0.200	0.656
Length of care	4.002	1	4.002	1.001	0.319
Group	44.026	1	44.026	11.015	0.001
Error	455.649	114	3.997
Total	475,682.000	122
Corrected Total	1491.541	121

Notes: ^aR Squared = 0.695 (Adjusted R Squared = 0.676). *p<0.001.

Figure 2 Family ability in taking care of MDs.