108
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The effect of local/topical analgesics on incisional pain in a pig model

, &
Pages 2169-2175 | Published online: 04 Sep 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Details of drug concentration, dosing volume and final dose per animal

Table 2 Study design, study day 0 is the surgery day

Figure 1 Withdrawal force following treatment with Exparel, the liposomal formulation of bupivacaine (A) and Marcaine, a commercial bupivacaine solution (B) in the SMI model.

Notes: The activity of both drugs was dose related. The duration of activity of Exparel was longer than that measured for Marcaine. Both drugs were not active 24 h post dosing. **p<0.001 vs. vehicle group.
Abbreviation: SMI, skin and muscle incision.
Figure 1 Withdrawal force following treatment with Exparel, the liposomal formulation of bupivacaine (A) and Marcaine, a commercial bupivacaine solution (B) in the SMI model.

Figure 2 Calculations of AUC expressing the level and duration of activity of the drugs.

Notes: The results presented in this figure show that treatment with Exparel at the highest dose used in the clinic had a superior effect vs. Marcaine at the highest commercially available dose. **p < 0.001 vs. vehicle; #p < 0.01 vs. 300 mg/animal Exparel.
Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 2 Calculations of AUC expressing the level and duration of activity of the drugs.

Table 3 The activity of local analgesics in SMI and SI incision models in pigs

Figure 3 Withdrawal force following treatment with Naropin (ropivacaine solution), Marcaine (bupivacaine solution) and Exparel (bupivacaine liposomal formulation) in an SI model in the pig.

Notes: The duration of activity of Naropin and Exparel was longer than that of Marcaine. *p<0.05; **p<0.001 vs. vehicle.
Abbreviation: SI, skin incision.
Figure 3 Withdrawal force following treatment with Naropin (ropivacaine solution), Marcaine (bupivacaine solution) and Exparel (bupivacaine liposomal formulation) in an SI model in the pig.