Figures & data
Figure 2 Flow diagram of the study selection process.
![Figure 2 Flow diagram of the study selection process.](/cms/asset/1cd1da20-76d9-4138-b2f9-49b0edfc713e/djpr_a_149647_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1 The general characteristic of the included studies
Figure 3 Forest plots of studies comparing FICB and NB for pain score after LLS.
Abbreviations: FICB, fascia iliaca compartment block; LLS, lower limb surgery; NB, no block; SMD, standard mean difference.
![Figure 3 Forest plots of studies comparing FICB and NB for pain score after LLS.](/cms/asset/301e9af5-e66d-4768-a0bb-61564731cb04/djpr_a_149647_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2 Pooled results according to subgroup analysis
Figure 5 Forest plots of studies comparing fascia iliaca compartment block and no block in terms of morphine consumption at 24 h after lower limb surgery.
Abbreviation: RR, relative risk.
![Figure 5 Forest plots of studies comparing fascia iliaca compartment block and no block in terms of morphine consumption at 24 h after lower limb surgery.](/cms/asset/bcfbb9ca-94a4-4efe-865e-60b9158a635f/djpr_a_149647_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Forest plots of studies comparing postoperative nausea and vomiting between the fascia iliaca compartment block and no block groups.
![Figure 6 Forest plots of studies comparing postoperative nausea and vomiting between the fascia iliaca compartment block and no block groups.](/cms/asset/61d16e3e-e407-47d7-83fa-71b5ff1a1a63/djpr_a_149647_f0006_c.jpg)