171
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Safety and efficacy of US-approved viscosupplements for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials

, , , &
Pages 217-228 | Published online: 07 May 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Abbreviation: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics

Table 2 Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis

Table 3 Assessment of study quality using Jadad scale

Figure 2 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on knee pain at 14 to 26 weeks.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SMD, standardized mean difference.
Figure 2 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on knee pain at 14 to 26 weeks.

Figure 3 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on knee function at 14 to 26 weeks.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SMD, standardized mean difference.
Figure 3 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on knee function at 14 to 26 weeks.

Figure 4 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on risk of serious adverse events.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on risk of serious adverse events.

Figure 5 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on risk of adverse event-related patient withdrawals.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5 Forest plot of viscosupplementation versus saline controls on risk of adverse event-related patient withdrawals.

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of study- and patient-related factors on saline-corrected knee pain

Table 5 Subgroup analysis of study- and patient-related factors on saline-corrected knee function

Table 6 Subgroup analysis of study- and patient-related factors on serious adverse events