81
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

, , , , &
Pages 223-230 | Published online: 13 Jul 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1 Schematic of the loading apparatus for flexibility testing in flexion–extension (left image), lateral bending (center image), and axial rotation (right image).

Figure 1 Schematic of the loading apparatus for flexibility testing in flexion–extension (left image), lateral bending (center image), and axial rotation (right image).

Figure 2 Testing protocol.

Note: (A) Intact, (B) bilateral posterior cervical cages at C5–C6, (C) plated ACDF at C6–C7, (D) addition of posterior bilateral cervical cages at C6–C7, (E) plated ACDF at C3–C5, and (F) bilateral posterior cervical cages at C3–C4 and C4–C5.
Abbreviation: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Figure 2 Testing protocol.

Figure 3 DTRAX Posterior Cervical Cage.

Note: The cervical cages are manufactured from implant grade titanium alloy (6AI-4V ELI Titanium) and each cage is 10 mm in length, 5.5 mm in width, and 2.5 mm in height.
Figure 3 DTRAX Posterior Cervical Cage.

Figure 4 ROM curves with 0 N preload: (A) FE, (B) LB, and (C) AR.

Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; AR, axial rotation; FE, flexion–extension; LB, lateral bending; ROM, range of motion.
Figure 4 ROM curves with 0 N preload: (A) FE, (B) LB, and (C) AR.

Table 1 Segmental ranges of motion in degrees, (mean ± SD) for each condition under 0 N follower preload and 1.5 Nm moment for each test condition.

Table 2 Effectiveness of posterior cervical cages as a supplement for single-level ACDF constructs

Table 3 Effectiveness of posterior cervical cages as a supplement for two-level ACDF constructs