97
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day in patients with major depressive disorder: exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan

, , , , &
Pages 1261-1272 | Published online: 16 May 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Forest plot of the HAM-D17 total score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 1 Forest plot of the HAM-D17 total score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 2 Forest plot of the HAM-D6 score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 2 Forest plot of the HAM-D6 score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 3 Forest plot of the MADRS total score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 3 Forest plot of the MADRS total score by subgroups: difference between venlafaxine ER treatment group and the placebo group in the adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 4 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of MDD (≤22 months/>22 months) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 4 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of MDD (≤22 months/>22 months) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 5 Adjusted mean change from baseline in each efficacy endpoint at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of MDD (A) <12 months/≥12 months, and (B) <48 months/≥48 months (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder.
Figure 5 Adjusted mean change from baseline in each efficacy endpoint at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of MDD (A) <12 months/≥12 months, and (B) <48 months/≥48 months (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Table 1 Demographic and disease characteristics by duration of MDD (≤22 months/>22 months) (FAS)

Figure 6 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by HAM-D17 total score at baseline (total score ≤22/total score >22) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Figure 6 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by HAM-D17 total score at baseline (total score ≤22/total score >22) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 7 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by history of previous depressive episodes (0 [single episode]/≥1 [recurrent episodes]) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Figure 7 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by history of previous depressive episodes (0 [single episode]/≥1 [recurrent episodes]) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Figure 8 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of current depressive episode (≤6.6 months/>6.6 months) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; HAM-D6, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–6 items; HAM-D17, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression–17 items; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Figure 8 Adjusted mean change from baseline at Week 8 with 95% CIs by duration of current depressive episode (≤6.6 months/>6.6 months) in each efficacy endpoint (FAS, LOCF, ANCOVA model).