172
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Frequency-dependent neural activity in primary angle-closure glaucoma

, , , , , & show all
Pages 271-282 | Published online: 18 Jan 2019

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographics and clinical measurements by group (mean ± SD)

Figure 1 The main effect of group on ALFF. The warm color represents a higher ALFF in PACG patients compared to NS, whereas the cool color represents a lower ALFF.

Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; L, left; NS, normal-sighted controls; PACG, primary angle-closure glaucoma; R, right.
Figure 1 The main effect of group on ALFF. The warm color represents a higher ALFF in PACG patients compared to NS, whereas the cool color represents a lower ALFF.

Table 2 The main effect of group on ALFF

Figure 2 The main effect for frequency band on ALFF. The warm color represents a higher ALFF in the slow-4 band compared to the slow-5 band, whereas the cool color represents a lower ALFF.

Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; L, left; R, right.
Figure 2 The main effect for frequency band on ALFF. The warm color represents a higher ALFF in the slow-4 band compared to the slow-5 band, whereas the cool color represents a lower ALFF.

Table 3 The difference in ALFF between two frequency bands

Figure 3 The results are obtained on comparison of ALFF between PACG and NS groups in each frequency band (post hoc two-sample t-tests, voxel-level P <0.001, GRF corrected, cluster-level P <0.01).

Notes: (A) altered ALFF values in slow-4 band between two groups, (B) altered ALFF values in slow-5 band between two groups, (C) the mean ALFF values of different brain regions in the two groups in slow-4 band, (D) the mean ALFF values of different brain regions in the two groups in slow-5 band.
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; GRF, Gaussian random field; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; L, left; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; NS, normal-sighted controls; PACG, primary angle-closure glaucoma; postCG, postcentral gyrus; preCG, precentral gyrus; R, right.
Figure 3 The results are obtained on comparison of ALFF between PACG and NS groups in each frequency band (post hoc two-sample t-tests, voxel-level P <0.001, GRF corrected, cluster-level P <0.01).

Table 4 The difference in ALFF in each frequency band between the two groups

Figure 4 ROC curve analysis of the mean ALFF in slow-4 and slow-5 bands for altered brain regions.

Notes: (A) ROC curve in ALFF (slow-4 band): PACG > NS, for R-IOG 0.235 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.145–0.326); PACG < NS for L-MOG 0.793 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.708–0.879), L-preCG 0.797 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.714–0.880), and L-postCG 0.742 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.649–0.835). (B) ROC curve in ALFF (slow-5 band): PACG > NS, for R-IOG 0.233 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.143–0.324); PACG < NS for L-IPL 0.843 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.765–0.922), L-postCG 0.781 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.693–0.869), and R-preCG/postCG 0.793 (P<0.001; 95% CI =0.707–0.880).
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; AUC, area under the curve; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; L, left; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; NS, normal-sighted controls; PACG, primary angle-closure glaucoma; PreCG, precentral gyrus; PostCG, postcentral gyrus; R, right; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4 ROC curve analysis of the mean ALFF in slow-4 and slow-5 bands for altered brain regions.

Figure 5 The correlations between the mean ALFF signal values of the different areas in slow-4 band and the behavioral performances.

Note: The greater mean ALFF values of the right inferior occipital gyrus were associated with (A) smaller RNFL thickness-OD (r=0.595, P<0.001); (B) OS (r=0.560, P<0.001); (C) greater VF-OD (r=−0.830, P<0.001); and (D) OS (r=−0.837, P<0.001) in the PACG group.
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; L, left; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister; PACG, primary angle-closure glaucoma; R, right; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; VF, visual field.
Figure 5 The correlations between the mean ALFF signal values of the different areas in slow-4 band and the behavioral performances.