Figures & data
Table 1 Summary of polymorphisms identified across analyses
Table 2 The effect of diagnosis on FA values (HS > MDD patients)
Figure 1 A comparison of FA findings between MDD patients and HS.
Abbreviations: ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CST, corticospinal tract; FA, fractional anisotropy; FWE, family-wise error; HS, healthy subjects; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; lt., left; MDD, major depressive disorder; UF, uncinate fasciculus.
![Figure 1 A comparison of FA findings between MDD patients and HS.](/cms/asset/c56bf544-6f6e-4683-95c4-e8de454eaa46/dndt_a_190268_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 A comparison of FA findings between T/T individuals (rs301806) and C-carrier individuals with MDD.
Abbreviations: FA, fractional anisotropy; FWE, family-wise error; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; lt., left; MDD, major depressive disorder; rt, right; SLF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus.
![Figure 2 A comparison of FA findings between T/T individuals (rs301806) and C-carrier individuals with MDD.](/cms/asset/912f88bd-af9b-42ba-8fcf-b607cf2c0474/dndt_a_190268_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3 The effect of genotype (rs301806) on FA values in MDD (C-carrier individuals > T/T individuals)
Table 4 Demographic and clinical characteristics among four groups regarding the rs301806 SNP
Figure 3 Genotype–diagnosis interactions.
Abbreviations: ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CST, corticospinal tract; FA, fractional anisotropy; FWE, family-wise error; HS, healthy subjects; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; lt., left; MDD, major depressive disorder; rt., right; SLF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; UF, uncinate fasciculus.
![Figure 3 Genotype–diagnosis interactions.](/cms/asset/2f1472de-86e8-4b1e-a34b-1897fb92805e/dndt_a_190268_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 5 The genotype–diagnosis interaction on FA values (rs301806: C-carrier individuals > T/T individuals)