105
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Altered Spontaneous Brain Activity Patterns in Patients After Lasik Surgery Using Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation: A Resting-State Functional MRI Study

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1907-1917 | Published online: 07 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 Typical fundus photographs of myopia patients before and after surgery.

Figure 1 Typical fundus photographs of myopia patients before and after surgery.

Table 1 Demographics and Visual Measurements Between PRL and POL Groups

Table 2 Brain Areas with Significantly Different ALFF Values Between Groups

Figure 2 Spontaneous brain activity in the PRL and POL groups. (A) The different ALFF regions between the PRL and POL groups. (B) Significant difference of brain activity in cerebrum. The red regions indicate higher ALFF values, and the green and blue regions imply lower AFLL values.

Notes: (A) The different ALFF regions between the PRL and POL groups. (B) significant difference of brain activity in cerebrum. The red regions indicate higher ALFF values, and the green and blue regions imply lower AFLL values.
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; L, left; R, right.
Figure 2 Spontaneous brain activity in the PRL and POL groups. (A) The different ALFF regions between the PRL and POL groups. (B) Significant difference of brain activity in cerebrum. The red regions indicate higher ALFF values, and the green and blue regions imply lower AFLL values.

Figure 3 The mean ALFF values between PRL and POL groups.

Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; L, left; R, right; Cingulum_Post_L, left posterior cingulate cortex; Frontal_Inf_Tri_R, right trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus.
Figure 3 The mean ALFF values between PRL and POL groups.

Figure 4 ROC curve analysis of the mean ALFF values for altered brain regions. (A) The area under the ROC curve was 0.980 (P<0.001; 95% CI=0.937–1.000) for SupraMarginal_L, Frontal_Inf_Tri_R 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000). (B) The area under the ROC curve was 0.987 (P<0.001; 95% CI=0.952–1.000) for Cingulum_Post_L; ParaHippocampal_L 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000); Vermis_1_2 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000).

Notes: (A) The area under the ROC curve were 0.980, (p<0.001; 95% CI: 0.937–1.000) for SupraMarginal_L, Frontal_Inf_Tri_R 1.000 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.000). (B) The area under the ROC curve were 0.987 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 0.952–1.000) for Cingulum_Post_L; ParaHippocampal_L 1.000 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.000); Vermis_1_2 1.000 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.000).
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; L, left; R, right; Cingulum_Post_L, left posterior cingulate cortex; Frontal_Inf_Tri_R, right trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus.
Figure 4 ROC curve analysis of the mean ALFF values for altered brain regions. (A) The area under the ROC curve was 0.980 (P<0.001; 95% CI=0.937–1.000) for SupraMarginal_L, Frontal_Inf_Tri_R 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000). (B) The area under the ROC curve was 0.987 (P<0.001; 95% CI=0.952–1.000) for Cingulum_Post_L; ParaHippocampal_L 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000); Vermis_1_2 1.000 (P<0.001; 95% CI=1.000–1.000).

Figure 5 Correlations between the HADS and ALFF values of left parahippocampal gyrus and left posterior cingulate cortex. The results shown in (A) and (B) both represent a negative correlation with the HADS and ALFF values in left parahippocampal gyrus and left posterior cingulate cortex, respectively.

Notes: The results shown in (A) and (B) both represented negative correlation with the HADS and ALFF values in left parahippocampal gyrus and left posterior cingulate cortex.
Abbreviations: HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation.
Figure 5 Correlations between the HADS and ALFF values of left parahippocampal gyrus and left posterior cingulate cortex. The results shown in (A) and (B) both represent a negative correlation with the HADS and ALFF values in left parahippocampal gyrus and left posterior cingulate cortex, respectively.

Figure 6 Significant differences in spontaneous brain activity between the PRL and POL groups. Different brain regions that were observed: 1) SupraMarginal_L; 2) Frontal_Inf_Tri_R; 3) Cingulum_Post_L; 4) ParaHippocampal_L; and 5) Vermis_1_2. The yellow areas present brain areas with increased ALFF values, and the purple areas present brain areas with decreased ALFF values.

Notes: Different brain regions that were observed: (1) SupraMarginal_L; (2) Frontal_Inf_Tri_R; (3) Cingulum_Post_L; (4) ParaHippocampal_L; (5) Vermis_1_2. The yellow areas present brain areas with increased ALFF values. And the purple areas present brain areas with decreased ALFF values.
Abbreviations: ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; L, left; R, right; Cingulum_Post_L, left posterior cingulate cortex; Frontal_Inf_Tri_R, right trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus.
Figure 6 Significant differences in spontaneous brain activity between the PRL and POL groups. Different brain regions that were observed: 1) SupraMarginal_L; 2) Frontal_Inf_Tri_R; 3) Cingulum_Post_L; 4) ParaHippocampal_L; and 5) Vermis_1_2. The yellow areas present brain areas with increased ALFF values, and the purple areas present brain areas with decreased ALFF values.

Figure 7 The relationship between changes in internal eye states and vision, brain activity, and emotional state.

Figure 7 The relationship between changes in internal eye states and vision, brain activity, and emotional state.

Table 3 Brain Regions with Altered ALFF Values and the Potential Impacts