68
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Can a physician predict the clinical response to first-line immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis?

, , , &
Pages 465-473 | Published online: 23 Oct 2012

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline data of all patients and groups according to the type of immunomodulatory treatment (IMT)

Figure 1 Distribution of EDSS score at baseline in groups with different immunomodulatory agents.

Abbreviations: EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; INF, interferon; GA, glatiramer acetate.
Figure 1 Distribution of EDSS score at baseline in groups with different immunomodulatory agents.

Figure 2 Effect of treatment on relapse numbers in the groups according to the type of immunomodulatory treatment (IMT).

Figure 2 Effect of treatment on relapse numbers in the groups according to the type of immunomodulatory treatment (IMT).

Table 2 Effect of treatment on EDSS progression in patient subgroups according to the length of continuous immunomodulatory treatment (IMT)

Figure 3 Sustained efficacy of longer than 6 years’ immunomodulatory treatment on disability.

Notes: Patients treated with IFN beta-1a intramuscularly had the smallest Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at baseline and 2, 4, and more than 6 years’ treatment (P = 0.011, 0.025, 0.003, and 0.025 respectively).
Figure 3 Sustained efficacy of longer than 6 years’ immunomodulatory treatment on disability.

Table 3 Baseline data of patients and treatment response in the groups according to clinical presentation at onset of multiple sclerosis (MS)

Table 4 Long-term effect of immunomodulatory treatment (IMT) on EDSS change in the groups according to short-term response to IMT by relapse numbers

Table 5 Incidences of side effects of immunomodulatory drugs