126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Differences in mGluR5 Availability Depending on the Level of Social Avoidance in Drug-Naïve Young Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2041-2053 | Received 21 Jun 2022, Accepted 03 Sep 2022, Published online: 12 Sep 2022

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic/Clinical Characteristics and PET Scan Information

Table 2 Demographic/Clinical Characteristics and PET Scan Information for L-SADS Patients, H-SADS Patients, and Healthy Controls

Figure 1 Representative mean images of [11C]ABP688 BPND, PET, and 3-Tesla MRI for 18 healthy controls. The [11C]ABP688 PET image is generated by averaging the reconstructed 21 frames of dynamic image.

Abbreviations: BPND, non-displaceable binding potential; PET, positron emission tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1 Representative mean images of [11C]ABP688 BPND, PET, and 3-Tesla MRI for 18 healthy controls. The [11C]ABP688 PET image is generated by averaging the reconstructed 21 frames of dynamic image.

Table 3 The ROI-Based Between-Group Comparisons of [11C]ABP688 BPND

Figure 2 Box plots of the ROI-based between-group comparisons in [11C]ABP688 BPND values. (AC) The L-SADS patient group had significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the bilateral SFC (right: uncorrected p = 0.024, left: uncorrected p = 0.029) and left MFC (uncorrected p = 0.032) compared to control group. (D) In addition, the L-SADS patient group showed significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the right SFCmedial relative to both the H-SADS patient group (uncorrected p = 0.042) and control group (uncorrected p = 0.024). (EJ) Moreover, the L-SADS patient group had significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the bilateral SFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.040, left: uncorrected p = 0.048), bilateral MFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.008, left: uncorrected p = 0.037), and bilateral IFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.034, left: uncorrected p = 0.032) compared with the H-SADS patient group. In box plots, the statistical significance is indicated as *Uncorrected p < 0.05 and **Uncorrected p < 0.01.

Abbreviations: ROI, region of interest; BPND, non-displaceable binding potential; L-SADS, depressed patients with low levels of social avoidance; SFC, superior frontal cortex; MFC, middle frontal cortex; SFCmedial, superior frontal cortex (medial part); H-SADS, depressed patients with high levels of social avoidance; SFCorb, superior frontal cortex (orbital part); MFCorb, middle frontal cortex (orbital part); IFCorb, inferior frontal cortex (orbital part).
Figure 2 Box plots of the ROI-based between-group comparisons in [11C]ABP688 BPND values. (A–C) The L-SADS patient group had significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the bilateral SFC (right: uncorrected p = 0.024, left: uncorrected p = 0.029) and left MFC (uncorrected p = 0.032) compared to control group. (D) In addition, the L-SADS patient group showed significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the right SFCmedial relative to both the H-SADS patient group (uncorrected p = 0.042) and control group (uncorrected p = 0.024). (E–J) Moreover, the L-SADS patient group had significantly lower [11C]ABP688 BPND in the bilateral SFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.040, left: uncorrected p = 0.048), bilateral MFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.008, left: uncorrected p = 0.037), and bilateral IFCorb (right: uncorrected p = 0.034, left: uncorrected p = 0.032) compared with the H-SADS patient group. In box plots, the statistical significance is indicated as *Uncorrected p < 0.05 and **Uncorrected p < 0.01.

Figure 3 Scatter plots of the correlations between the SADS score and [11C]ABP688 BPND in the entire MDD patient group. The SADS score had significant positive correlations with [11C]ABP688 BPND in the (A) right SFCmedial (r = 0.450, p = 0.046), (B and C) bilateral SFCorb (right: r = 0.458, p = 0.042, left: r = 0.463, p = 0.040), (D and E) bilateral MFCorb (right: r = 0.499, p = 0.025, left: r = 0.451, p = 0.046), and (F and G) bilateral IFCorb (right: r = 0.450, p = 0.046, left: r = 0.503, p = 0.024). Yellow and blue dots indicate the L-SADS patient group and the H-SADS patient group, respectively. Cross marks indicate MDD patients with comorbid social phobia. The solid and dotted lines indicate the regression lines and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.

Abbreviations: SADS, Social Avoidance and Distress Scale; BPND, non-displaceable binding potential; MDD, major depressive disorder; SFCmedial, superior frontal cortex (medial part); SFCorb, superior frontal cortex (orbital part); MFCorb, middle frontal cortex (orbital part); IFCorb, inferior frontal cortex (orbital part); L-SADS, depressed patients with low levels of social avoidance; H-SADS, depressed patients with high levels of social avoidance.
Figure 3 Scatter plots of the correlations between the SADS score and [11C]ABP688 BPND in the entire MDD patient group. The SADS score had significant positive correlations with [11C]ABP688 BPND in the (A) right SFCmedial (r = 0.450, p = 0.046), (B and C) bilateral SFCorb (right: r = 0.458, p = 0.042, left: r = 0.463, p = 0.040), (D and E) bilateral MFCorb (right: r = 0.499, p = 0.025, left: r = 0.451, p = 0.046), and (F and G) bilateral IFCorb (right: r = 0.450, p = 0.046, left: r = 0.503, p = 0.024). Yellow and blue dots indicate the L-SADS patient group and the H-SADS patient group, respectively. †Cross marks indicate MDD patients with comorbid social phobia. The solid and dotted lines indicate the regression lines and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.