Figures & data
Table 1 Subject Characteristics
Table 2 Changes in Objective Measures of Sleep Other Than Arousal Index in Participants with and without Poor Subjective Sleep Quality
Figure 1 Changes in arousal index across M1/2 and MF. The changes in the arousal index across the menstrual cycle in athletes with poor subjective sleep quality differed from those in athletes without poor subjective sleep quality (p = 0.036). In athletes with poor subjective sleep quality, the arousal index was significantly higher at M1 than at MF (p = 0.015 for ANOVA, p = 0.016 for comparison between M1 and MF, p = 0.111 for comparison between M2 and MF, and p > 0.999 for comparison between M1 and M2). In athletes without poor subjective sleep quality, the arousal index was similar across menstrual cycles (p for ANOVA, 0.131; p = 0.531 for comparison between M1 and MF, p > 0.999 for comparison between M2 and MF, and p = 0.147 for comparison between M1 and M2).
![Figure 1 Changes in arousal index across M1/2 and MF. The changes in the arousal index across the menstrual cycle in athletes with poor subjective sleep quality differed from those in athletes without poor subjective sleep quality (p = 0.036). In athletes with poor subjective sleep quality, the arousal index was significantly higher at M1 than at MF (p = 0.015 for ANOVA, p = 0.016 for comparison between M1 and MF, p = 0.111 for comparison between M2 and MF, and p > 0.999 for comparison between M1 and M2). In athletes without poor subjective sleep quality, the arousal index was similar across menstrual cycles (p for ANOVA, 0.131; p = 0.531 for comparison between M1 and MF, p > 0.999 for comparison between M2 and MF, and p = 0.147 for comparison between M1 and M2).](/cms/asset/9e85f2cd-330a-4156-87d1-c5c8cbfa8297/dnss_a_12302047_f0001_c.jpg)