84
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Latent Profiles and Transitions of Bedtime Procrastination Among Chinese College Students: The Predictive Roles of Anxiety, Depression, Problematic Smartphone Use and Self-Control

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 801-811 | Received 12 Mar 2024, Accepted 04 Jun 2024, Published online: 17 Jun 2024

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of the Sample

Table 2 Fit Indices of the for the LPA Models (T0 to T1), for Increasing Number of Classes (1 to 5)

Figure 1 Latent profile indicator conditional means for the three‐profile solution at T0.A line chart that shows the mean scores on 8 items of bedtime procrastination for three subgroups identified by the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method at baseline (T0). The third subgroup has the highest mean score and is named the High Bedtime Procrastination group, the second subgroup has the next highest score and is named the Moderate Bedtime Procrastination group, and the first subgroup has the lowest mean score, named the Low Bedtime Procrastination group.

Figure 1 Latent profile indicator conditional means for the three‐profile solution at T0.A line chart that shows the mean scores on 8 items of bedtime procrastination for three subgroups identified by the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method at baseline (T0). The third subgroup has the highest mean score and is named the High Bedtime Procrastination group, the second subgroup has the next highest score and is named the Moderate Bedtime Procrastination group, and the first subgroup has the lowest mean score, named the Low Bedtime Procrastination group.

Figure 2 Latent profile indicator conditional means for the three‐profile solution at T1. A line chart that shows the mean scores on 8 items of bedtime procrastination for three subgroups identified by the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method at T1. The third subgroup has the highest mean score and is named the High Bedtime Procrastination group, the second subgroup has the next highest score and is named the Moderate Bedtime Procrastination group, and the first subgroup has the lowest mean score, named the Low Bedtime Procrastination group.

Figure 2 Latent profile indicator conditional means for the three‐profile solution at T1. A line chart that shows the mean scores on 8 items of bedtime procrastination for three subgroups identified by the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method at T1. The third subgroup has the highest mean score and is named the High Bedtime Procrastination group, the second subgroup has the next highest score and is named the Moderate Bedtime Procrastination group, and the first subgroup has the lowest mean score, named the Low Bedtime Procrastination group.

Table 3 Latent Transition Probabilities Examining Continuity and Change from T0 to T1

Table 4 Results of Multinomial Logistic Regressions on Transition Probabilities