92
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Optogenetics: illuminating the neural bases of rodent behavior

, &
Pages 33-51 | Published online: 08 Dec 2014

Figures & data

Table 1 Transgenic mouse lines used for optogenetic manipulation of behavior

Figure 1 Common schemes utilized for optogenetic manipulation of neuronal subtypes.

Notes:(AD) Genetic opsin constructs are flanked by ITRs (gray box) and followed by an enhancer sequence (pink box). Promoters (pink arrow) drive cell-type specific expression. The ChR2 constructs (blue rectangle) are fused to an enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP; green arrow) for simple visualization under a microscope for electrophysiological recording or later immunohistochemical analysis. (A) An adeno-associated virus (AAV) containing ChR2 on a CamKII promoter infects excitatory neurons of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and travels down their axons, allowing for terminal stimulation in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). (B) An AAV containing a double inverted open (DIO) ChR2 construct is injected into the NAc of a mouse expressing Cre in Dopamine 1 (D1) receptor medium spiny neurons (MSNs). The opsin is double floxed by distinct flox sites (black and gray triangles). These two sites are recognized by Cre and the gene is spliced out, inverted, and re-ligated expressing ChR2 selectively in D1-MSNs. (C) A tetracycline (“Tet”) on (“Tet-off”) activated ChR2 is injected into a transgenic mouse that expresses a tet trans-activator (tTA) in response to c-fos activation. ChR2 is transcribed exclusively in the presence of c-fos-promoted tTA transcription when doxycycline (dox), an inactivator of tTA, is not present. With this strategy, previously active cells are optogenetically activated. (D) A pseudorabies virus (PRV) expressing Cre is injected in the NAc and retrogradely transports Cre up terminals in the NAc. A DIO-AAV construct containing ChR2 is injected into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and is selectively expressed in cells that contain Cre following retrograde transport, allowing for selective optogenetic activation of VTA cells that terminate in the NAc.
Abbreviations: ChR2, channelrhodopsin 2; TRE, tetracycline response element; ITR, inverted terminal repeats; Hipp, hippocampus; PR, .
Figure 1 Common schemes utilized for optogenetic manipulation of neuronal subtypes.

Table 2 Viral constructs utilized in optogenetic manipulation of behavior

Table 3 Behavioral outcomes of in vivo optogenetic manipulation with channel opsins

Table 4 Behavior outcomes of in vivo optogenetic manipulation with signaling opsins

Figure 2 Optogenetically mimicking naturalistic neuronal firing differentially regulates cellular and behavioral outcomes.

Notes: (AC) Example of stimulation paradigms to mimic naturalistic firing patterns of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons. (A) In vivo recording is used to determine naturalistic firing patterns of DA neurons. The example cartoon trace shows phasic bursts of VTA-DA neurons following social defeat stress. (B) In vitro slice recordings validate expression of the opsin and functional firing frequency during optogenetic stimulation. (C) In vivo phasic optogenetic stimulation of VTA-DA neurons promotes depression-like outcomes to social defeat stress, while tonic optogenetic stimulation reverses susceptibility.
Figure 2 Optogenetically mimicking naturalistic neuronal firing differentially regulates cellular and behavioral outcomes.