165
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Efficacy and safety of two fast-absorbing formulations of paracetamol in combination with caffeine for episodic tension-type headache: results from two randomized placebo- and active-controlled trials

, , &
Pages 41-57 | Published online: 26 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 (A) Subject disposition, study 1; (B) subject disposition, study 2.

Notes: aIn both studies, the safety population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received any study medication. In study 1, the intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of participants who received at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment. In study 2, the ITT population consisted of those who had at least one evaluable headache during the treatment phase, received at least one dose of study medication, and had at least one postbaseline pain-intensity assessment.
Abbreviations: ITT, intent to treat; AE, adverse event.
Figure 1 (A) Subject disposition, study 1; (B) subject disposition, study 2.

Table 1 Demographics and baseline characteristics, study 1, safety/ITT population

Table 2 Demographics and baseline characteristics for study 2, safety/ITT population

Figure 2 Time to perceptible pain relief (primary outcome), Kaplan–Meier curve, study 1, intent-to-treat population.

Notes: Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for comparison with placebo were 1.25 (0.83–1.9) for paracetamol–sodium bicarbonate–caffeine, 1.08 (0.72–1.61) for ibuprofen, and 0.95 (0.62–1.45) for paracetamol.
Figure 2 Time to perceptible pain relief (primary outcome), Kaplan–Meier curve, study 1, intent-to-treat population.

Figure 3 Adjusted mean SPID0–60, SPID0–90, SPID0–120, and SPID0–240 (secondary outcomes), study 1, ITT population.

Notes: aAdjusted means are least squares means from ANCOVA adjusted for baseline pain intensity. Positive values indicate reduction in pain. bP<0.05 vs placebo; cP<0.05 vs paracetamol.
Abbreviations: SPID, sum of pain-intensity difference (numeric subscript ranges indicate minutes); ITT, intent to treat; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance.
Figure 3 Adjusted mean SPID0–60, SPID0–90, SPID0–120, and SPID0–240 (secondary outcomes), study 1, ITT population.

Figure 4 Adjusted mean TOTPAR (secondary outcome), study 1, ITT population.

Notes: aAdjusted means are least squares means from ANCOVA adjusted for baseline pain intensity. bP<0.05 vs placebo; cP<0.05 vs paracetamol.
Abbreviations: TOTPAR, total pain relief (numeric subscript ranges indicate minutes); ITT, intent to treat; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance.
Figure 4 Adjusted mean TOTPAR (secondary outcome), study 1, ITT population.

Table 3 Number of subjects with headache resolution and global impression of treatment (secondary efficacy outcomes), study 1, ITT population

Figure 5 Adjusted mean SPID0–1, SPID0–2, SPID0–3 (secondary outcomes), and SPID0–4 (primary outcome), study 2, ITT population.

Notes: aAdjusted means and confidence limits for treatment differences from ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled site as fixed factors and baseline intensity as covariate. Negative values indicate reduction in pain. Treatment differences shown are for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine versus either ibuprofen or placebo such that a negative result favors paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine.
Abbreviations: SPID, sum of pain-intensity difference (numeric subscript ranges indicate hours); ITT, intent to treat; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5 Adjusted mean SPID0–1, SPID0–2, SPID0–3 (secondary outcomes), and SPID0–4 (primary outcome), study 2, ITT population.

Figure 6 Adjusted mean TOTPAR0–1, TOTPAR0–2, TOTPAR0–3, and TOTPAR0–4 (secondary outcomes), study 2, ITT population.

Notes: aAdjusted means and confidence limits for treatment differences from ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled site as fixed factors and baseline intensity as covariate. Treatment differences shown are for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine versus either ibuprofen or placebo such that a positive result favors paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine.
Abbreviations: TOTPAR, total pain relief (numeric subscript ranges indicate hours); ITT, intent to treat; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6 Adjusted mean TOTPAR0–1, TOTPAR0–2, TOTPAR0–3, and TOTPAR0–4 (secondary outcomes), study 2, ITT population.

Figure 7 (A) Time to perceptible pain relief and (B) time to meaningful pain relief (both secondary outcomes), Kaplan–Meier curves, study 2, intent-to-treat population.

Notes: Time to perceptible relief: hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for comparison with placebo was 1.12 (0.72–1.73) for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine and 0.97 (0.62–1.52) for ibuprofen; hazard ratio (95% CI) for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine compared with ibuprofen was 1.17 (0.81–1.67). Time to meaningful relief: hazard ratio (95% CI) for comparison with placebo was 1.11 (0.72–1.73) for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine and 1.09 (0.69–1.73) for ibuprofen; hazard ratio (95% CI) for paracetamol with Optizorb–caffeine compared with ibuprofen was 1.03 (0.71–1.48). Circles represent censored data.
Figure 7 (A) Time to perceptible pain relief and (B) time to meaningful pain relief (both secondary outcomes), Kaplan–Meier curves, study 2, intent-to-treat population.

Table 4 Number of subjects with complete relief, global impression of treatment, and use of rescue medication (secondary efficacy outcomes), study 2, ITT population

Table 5 TEAEs in study 1, safety population

Table 6 TEAEs in study 2, safety population

Table S1 Additional secondary efficacy outcomes from study 1, ITT population