131
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Efficacy of nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.1% in improving clinical outcomes following cataract surgery in patients with diabetes: an analysis of two randomized studies

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1021-1029 | Published online: 29 May 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 Study design.

Abbreviation: NPDR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Figure 1 Study design.

Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics of patients in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS)

Figure 2 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline to Day 14 and maintained through Day 90 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Notes: P-value (study 1: 0.003; study 2: 0.172; pooled: 0.001); *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.
Figure 2 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline to Day 14 and maintained through Day 90 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Figure 3 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline and maintained through Day 90 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Notes: P-value (study 1: 0.001; study 2: 0.111; pooled: <0.001); *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.
Figure 3 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline and maintained through Day 90 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Figure 4 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline and maintained through Day 60 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Notes: P-value (study 1: 0.046; study 2: 0.272; pooled: 0.025); *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.
Figure 4 Percentage of patients with BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline and maintained through Day 60 in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS).

Table 2 Summary of BCVA outcomes in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS)

Table 3 Mean BCVA at baseline and at each postoperative visit in each treatment group by individual study and pooled data (FAS)