Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients by group

Characteristics	Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT00	Tecnis Symfony ZXR00/Tecnis ZMB00	p-value
Gender (male/female)	2/10	4/10	0.35
Age (years)	64.2±8.34 (51–75)	64.4±7.65 (53–80)	0.93
Pre-CDVA	0.24±0.18 (0.00–0.54)	0.16±0.19 (0.00–0.70)	0.063

Notes: Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (lower bound – upper bound). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.

Abbreviation: Pre-CDVA, preoperative best corrected distance visual acuity.

Table 2 Descriptive measures for implanted IOL refractive power (diopters), postoperative spherical equivalent, postoperative visual acuities, and mesopic pupillometry for Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT00 and Tecnis Symfony ZXR00/Tecnis ZMB00 lenses

Measurement	TFNT00 (n=20)	ZXR00/ZMB00 (n=20)	p-value
Diopters	22.23±1.51 (20.00–25.50)	21.00±2.66 (16.50–26.50)	>0.05
Postoperative UDVA	0.01±0.04 (−0.04–0.10)	−0.10±0.15 (−0.30–0.18)	<0.05*
Postoperative UIVA	0.14±0.05 (0.06–0.22)	0.20±0.05 (0.14–0.32)	<0.01*
Postoperative UNVA	−0.03±0.04 (−0.1–0.06)	0.11±0.07 (0.00–0.24)	<0.01*
Postoperative SE	−0.07±0.23 (−0.50–0.25)	−0.09±0.27 (−0.50–0.50)	>0.05
Postoperative CDVA	−0.07±0.06 (−0.10–0.16)	−0.16±0.11 (−0.30–0.12)	<0.01¥
Pupilometry (mesopic)	4.78±0.64 (3.50–5.50)	4.90±0.77 (3.50–6.50)	>0.05

Notes:

¥ ANOVA;

* Kruskal–Wallis. Data shown as mean ± SD (min–max). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; CDVA, corrected distance visual acuity; Cyl, cylinder; IOL, intraocular lens; SE, spherical equivalent; Sph, sphere; UDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity; UIVA, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity; UNVA, uncorrected near visual acuity.

Figure 1 Photopic without glare situation comparison between TFNT00 and ZXR00/ZMB00 lenses.

Notes: ^*Statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.
Abbreviation: cpd, cycles per degree.

Figure 2 Photopic with glare situation comparison between Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT00 and Tecnis Symfony ZXR00/Tecnis ZMB00 lenses.

Notes: ^*Statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.
Abbreviation: cpd, cycles per degree.

Figure 3 Mesopic without glare situation comparison between Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT00 and Tecnis Symfony ZXR00/Tecnis ZMB00 lenses.

Notes: ^*Statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.
Abbreviation: cpd, cycles per degree.

Figure 4 Binocular defocus curve of Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT00 and Tecnis Symfony ZXR00/Tecnis ZMB00 lenses, with distance correction in place.

Notes: ^*Statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Acrysof IQ^® Panoptix^® TFNT00: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA); Tecnis^® Symfony^® ZXR00 and Tecnis^® ZMB00: Johnson&Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA.