Figures & data
Figure 1 Fitting of the corneal specimen on the BioTester device rake battery just prior to testing.
![Figure 1 Fitting of the corneal specimen on the BioTester device rake battery just prior to testing.](/cms/asset/0e89037f-4915-42b2-971c-26ffec1e99c0/doph_a_153509_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Young’s modulus E linear regression fitting performed on stress–strain curves.
Abbreviation: SMILE, small-incision lenticule extraction.
![Figure 2 Young’s modulus E linear regression fitting performed on stress–strain curves.](/cms/asset/677a7274-6516-48b2-84de-daa4c1c8c7e1/doph_a_153509_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 Comparative tensile measurements between the six groups
Figure 3 Summary of biomechanical tensile test differential results per group studied.
Abbreviation: SMILE, small-incision lenticule extraction.
![Figure 3 Summary of biomechanical tensile test differential results per group studied.](/cms/asset/2e3e056c-78e3-407e-a349-beca1b09b12c/doph_a_153509_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2 Comparative analysis of tensile results