Figures & data
Figure 1 Assessment of optical coherence tomography images of patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal aflibercept.
Abbreviations: ELM, external limiting membrane; EZ, ellipsoid zone.
![Figure 1 Assessment of optical coherence tomography images of patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal aflibercept.](/cms/asset/3660af27-a257-4203-8f6c-a17cdb90f40d/doph_a_156162_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Results of assessments of functional and morphologic parameters of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with IVA injections over a 12-month period.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; IVA, intravitreal aflibercept; logMAR, logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; MD, mean deviation.
![Figure 2 Results of assessments of functional and morphologic parameters of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with IVA injections over a 12-month period.](/cms/asset/6e2a4c90-dd97-435a-961a-74aeef619c6e/doph_a_156162_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics at baseline and 12 months after the aflibercept treatment in neovascular AMD patients
Figure 3 Scatterplots showing the relationship between change in lesion size over 12 months and change in MD for each treated eye.
![Figure 3 Scatterplots showing the relationship between change in lesion size over 12 months and change in MD for each treated eye.](/cms/asset/7183fced-1d54-431d-9f01-bd5501d743af/doph_a_156162_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Grade of ELM and EZ of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with IVA injections over a 12-month period.
Abbreviations: ELM, external limiting membrane; EZ, ellipsoid zone; IVA, intravitreal aflibercept.
![Figure 4 Grade of ELM and EZ of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with IVA injections over a 12-month period.](/cms/asset/755bf82a-2e61-4901-b866-c983ae441069/doph_a_156162_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 (A) Scatterplots showing the relationship between final best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR units) and baseline foveal threshold (dB) for each treated eye. (B) Scatterplots showing the relationship between final best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR units) and baseline integrity of the ELM for each treated eye.
![Figure 5 (A) Scatterplots showing the relationship between final best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR units) and baseline foveal threshold (dB) for each treated eye. (B) Scatterplots showing the relationship between final best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR units) and baseline integrity of the ELM for each treated eye.](/cms/asset/f0c09c8c-291e-4b39-b87a-9f6f88fd643c/doph_a_156162_f0005_b.jpg)
Table 2 Correlation between final best-corrected visual acuity in logMAR units and parameters