121
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Trial Report

Comparison of incision size and intraocular lens performance after implantation with three preloaded systems and one manual delivery system

, , &
Pages 1495-1503 | Published online: 21 Aug 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 The UltraSert® preloaded delivery system.

Notes: The UltraSert preloaded delivery system (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) is a single-use system made up of a nozzle, main body, and plunger that delivers the preloaded IOL by manually advancing the plunger with a push mechanism. The system is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for use with the AcrySof® IQ Aspheric IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Abbreviation: IOL, intraocular lens.
Figure 1 The UltraSert® preloaded delivery system.

Table 1 Study population demographics and baseline characteristics

Figure 2 Mean corneal incision size after intraocular lens implantation of preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Notes: (A) Preloaded system U had the smallest mean corneal incision size among the preloaded devices. Preloaded systems T and S resulted in significantly greater mean corneal incision sizes. (B) Preloaded system U resulted in a significantly smaller mean corneal incision size than the manual delivery system. Data presented as mean ± standard error; n=19 eyes for preloaded system U, 26 eyes for preloaded system T, 26 eyes for preloaded system S, and 28 eyes for the manual delivery system. *Statistical significance (P<0.025), as determined by a two-sample t-test based on superiority hypothesis testing as compared to preloaded system T, system S, or the manual delivery system.
Figure 2 Mean corneal incision size after intraocular lens implantation of preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Figure 3 Mean corneal incision size enlargement caused by IOL delivery using preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Notes: (A) Preloaded system U had the least corneal incision enlargement among the preloaded devices. Incision enlargements following IOL insertion using preloaded system T and system S were greater than those of system U. (B) The manual delivery system resulted in less corneal incision enlargement than preloaded system U and had the least mean corneal incision enlargement of all the devices tested. Data presented as mean; n=19 eyes for preloaded system U, 26 eyes for preloaded system T, 26 eyes for preloaded system S, and 28 eyes for the manual delivery system.
Abbreviation: IOL, intraocular lens.
Figure 3 Mean corneal incision size enlargement caused by IOL delivery using preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Figure 4 SIA following implantation of preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Notes: (A) Less SIA was observed in patients following intraocular lens insertion using preloaded system U than that of systems T and S. (B) Preloaded system U also resulted in less SIA than the manual delivery system. Data presented as mean; n=19 eyes for preloaded system U, 26 eyes for preloaded system T, 26 eyes for preloaded system S, and 28 eyes for the manual delivery system.
Abbreviations: D, diopters; SIA, surgically induced astigmatism.
Figure 4 SIA following implantation of preloaded systems or manual delivery system.

Table 2 Observations of IOL–delivery device interactions and surgically induced astigmatism

Table 3 Treatment emergent ocular adverse events (serious and nonserious)