64
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and visual function in Japanese glaucoma patients

, &
Pages 259-267 | Published online: 28 Feb 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1 Average subscale scores for glaucoma patients on a Japanese version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Figure 1 Average subscale scores for glaucoma patients on a Japanese version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Table 1 Ophthalmological data for the glaucoma patients

Figure 2 Composite 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores in the better eye (y-axis) are correlated with mean deviation scores from Humphrey Field Analyzer program 30-2 (x-axis).

Figure 2 Composite 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores in the better eye (y-axis) are correlated with mean deviation scores from Humphrey Field Analyzer program 30-2 (x-axis).

Figure 3 Composite 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores in the worse eye (y-axis) are correlated with mean deviation scores from Humphrey Field Analyzer program 30-2 (x-axis).

Figure 3 Composite 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores in the worse eye (y-axis) are correlated with mean deviation scores from Humphrey Field Analyzer program 30-2 (x-axis).

Table 2 P values and correlation coefficients for single linear regression analysis of the association between visual function and visual disability indices in the better eye

Table 3 P values and correlation coefficients for single linear regression analysis of visual function and visual disability indices in the worse eye

Figure 4 Average subscale scores for young and old glaucoma patients.

Note: *P < 0.001.
Figure 4 Average subscale scores for young and old glaucoma patients.

Table 4 Visual function data in young and old glaucoma patients

Table 5 MD threshold scores from HFA program 30-2 of which the number of the patients becomes significantly higher to have lower subscale scores. The definition of the lower subscale score was determined as lower than 59