155
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A Phase II/III, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study of the safety and efficacy of OTX-101 in the treatment of dry eye disease

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1921-1929 | Published online: 02 Oct 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the study design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the study design.

Figure 2 Subject disposition throughout the study.

Figure 2 Subject disposition throughout the study.

Table 1 Subject demographic characteristics (ITT population)

Figure 3 The mean CFB in total conjunctival lissamine green staining scores by study visit is presented for the vehicle group (open squares), OTX-101 0.05% group (light blue diamonds), and OTX-101 0.09% group (dark blue circles).

Note: Statistically significant reductions in the mean CFB relative to vehicle were observed for OTX-101 0.09% at Day 42 (P=0.048), Day 56 (P=0.029), and Day 84 (P=0.0076) and at Day 84 for the OTX-101 0.05% group (P=0.006).
Abbreviations: CFB, change from baseline; SE, standard error.
Figure 3 The mean CFB in total conjunctival lissamine green staining scores by study visit is presented for the vehicle group (open squares), OTX-101 0.05% group (light blue diamonds), and OTX-101 0.09% group (dark blue circles).

Figure 4 The mean CFB in total corneal fluorescein staining scores by study visit is presented for the vehicle group (unshaded bars), OTX-101 0.05% group (light blue shading), and OTX-101 0.09% group (dark blue shading).

Note: Statistically significant reductions in the mean CFB relative to vehicle were observed for OTX-101 0.05% at Day 28 (P=0.0025), Day 42 (P=0.0015), and Day 84 (P=0.024), as well as at Day 28 (P=0.015) and Day 84 (P=0.0003) for the OTX-101 0.09% group.
Abbreviations: CFB, change from baseline; SE, standard error.
Figure 4 The mean CFB in total corneal fluorescein staining scores by study visit is presented for the vehicle group (unshaded bars), OTX-101 0.05% group (light blue shading), and OTX-101 0.09% group (dark blue shading).

Figure 5 Schirmer’s tear test responders.

Notes: The proportion of subjects with a ≥10 mm improvement in Schirmer’s tear test scores at Day 84, as compared to baseline, is presented for the vehicle group (unshaded bars), OTX-101 0.05% group (light blue shading), and OTX-101 0.09% group (dark blue shading). A statistically higher proportion of subjects with a ≥10 mm improvement in Schirmer’s test scores was observed in the OTX-101 0.09% group (P=0.007) relative to vehicle.
Figure 5 Schirmer’s tear test responders.

Table 2 Safety summary of common ocular and non-ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (safety population)

Table 3 Subject’s assessment of the comfort/tolerability of the study medication (safety population)