166
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein

, , &
Pages 2183-2188 | Published online: 29 Oct 2018

Figures & data

Table 1 Minimum and maximum IOP value and mean ± SD for NCT, nGAT, fGAT

Table 2 Minimum–maximum value, mean value ± SD of CCT, refractive value, keratometric value

Figure 1 Correlation analysis of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and fGAT.

Abbreviations: fGAT, GAT with fluorescein; GAT, Goldmann, applanation tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; NCT, noncontact tonometer.
Figure 1 Correlation analysis of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and fGAT.

Figure 2 Correlation analysis of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and nGAT.

Abbreviations: GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; NCT, noncontact tonometer; nGAT, GAT without fluorescein.
Figure 2 Correlation analysis of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and nGAT.

Figure 3 Bland–Altman plot of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and fGAT.

Abbreviations: fGAT, GAT with fluorescein; GAT, Goldmann, applanation tono­meter; IOP, intraocular pressure; NCT, noncontact tonometer.
Figure 3 Bland–Altman plot of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and fGAT.

Figure 4 Bland–Altman plot of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and nGAT.

Abbreviations: GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; NCT, noncontact tonometer; nGAT, GAT without fluorescein.
Figure 4 Bland–Altman plot of IOP (mmHg) between NCT and nGAT.