84
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of agreement and efficiency of a swept source-optical coherence tomography device and an optical low-coherence reflectometry device for biometry measurements during cataract evaluation

, &
Pages 2245-2251 | Published online: 01 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Study flowchart.

Notes: Patients were imaged with both the IOLMaster 700 and the LENSTAR LS 900. The total acquisition time and biometry values for each device were recorded.
Abbreviation: K, keratometry.
Figure 1 Study flowchart.

Table 1 Demographics of the study subjects

Table 2 Mean acquisition times of the IOLMaster 700 and LENSTAR LS 900

Table 3 ICCs between the mean biometry values of the IOLMaster 700 and LENSTAR LS 900

Figure 2 Linear regression of the IOLMaster 700 vs the LENSTAR LS 900.

Notes: (A) Axial length, (B) anterior chamber depth, (C) lens thickness, (D) keratometry 1, and (E) keratometry 2.
Abbreviation: K, keratometry.
Figure 2 Linear regression of the IOLMaster 700 vs the LENSTAR LS 900.

Figure 3 Bland–Altman plots showing the mean difference (dotted line) and 95% upper and lower limits of agreement (solid lines) for biometry measurements obtained by the IOLMaster 700 and LENSTAR LS 900.

Notes: (A) Axial length, (B) anterior chamber depth, (C) lens thickness, (D) keratometry 1, and (E) keratometry 2.
Abbreviation: K, keratometry.
Figure 3 Bland–Altman plots showing the mean difference (dotted line) and 95% upper and lower limits of agreement (solid lines) for biometry measurements obtained by the IOLMaster 700 and LENSTAR LS 900.