79
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Treatment with bimatoprost for exophthalmos in patients with inactive thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy

&
Pages 2415-2421 | Published online: 27 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Exophthalmos measurement.

Note: Exophthalmos value was defined as the perpendicular distance from the top point of the corneal surface to the line between the bilateral frontal processes of the zygomatic bones.
Figure 1 Exophthalmos measurement.

Figure 2 Volume measurement.

Notes: Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around tissue on MR images, and cross-sectional areas of the ROIs were measured. The volume of each tissue type was calculated by multiplying the sum of the cross-sectional area by the slice thickness (1.5 mm). (A) Axial slice shows cross-sectional areas of orbital fat (Fat). (B) Axial slice shows the cross-sectional areas of the lateral rectus (LR) and medial rectus (MR) muscles, eyeball (EB), and optic nerve (ON). (C) Sagittal slice shows the cross-sectional areas of the superior rectus (SR) and inferior rectus (IR) muscles. (D) Axial slice shows the cross-sectional area of the superior oblique (SO) muscle. (E) Coronal slice shows the cross-sectional areas of the inferior oblique (IO) muscle.
Figure 2 Volume measurement.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with TAO

Figure 3 Diagram of patients who were included and dropped out.

Notes: Thirteen patients were included in this study. Four of the 13 dropped out. In the final analysis, we analyzed nine orbits of nine patients.
Abbreviation: TAO, thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.
Figure 3 Diagram of patients who were included and dropped out.

Table 2 Changes in exophthalmos values and orbital tissue volume from before to after treatment with bimatoprost

Figure 4 Exophthalmos values.

Note: Mean values after 12 months of treatment were not significantly different from those before treatment (P=0.82).
Figure 4 Exophthalmos values.

Figure 5 Orbital fat volume.

Note: Mean volume after 12 months of treatment was not significantly different from that before treatment (P=0.70).
Figure 5 Orbital fat volume.

Figure 6 Extraocular muscle volume.

Note: Mean volume after 12 months of treatment was not significantly different from that before treatment (P=0.32).
Figure 6 Extraocular muscle volume.

Table 3 Exophthalmos values and orbital tissue volume from before treatment to last MRI examination in patients who dropped out