Figures & data
Figure 1 (A) VISCO360® viscosurgical system. Illustration of the device showing a handpiece with a microcatheter, control wheel for advancing and retracting the microcatheter, viscoelastic reservoir/infusion pump and a locking mechanism. Images are sourced from Sight Sciences, http://sightsciences.com and used with permission. (B) The iStent® GTS100 trabecular bypass system. Images are sourced from Glaukos Corp., https://www.glaukos.com and used with permission.
![Figure 1 (A) VISCO360® viscosurgical system. Illustration of the device showing a handpiece with a microcatheter, control wheel for advancing and retracting the microcatheter, viscoelastic reservoir/infusion pump and a locking mechanism. Images are sourced from Sight Sciences, http://sightsciences.com and used with permission. (B) The iStent® GTS100 trabecular bypass system. Images are sourced from Glaukos Corp., https://www.glaukos.com and used with permission.](/cms/asset/8ad39324-9278-4a1b-af42-ceac334a3ac7/doph_a_12176474_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Patient demographics and disease characteristics
Figure 2 Mean IOP (±SD) for all follow-up visits for both cohorts. *P<0.05 compared with baseline. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at preop and 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the preop, 1 month, and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-Bypass.
Abbreviations: CE, cataract extraction; TM-bypass, iStent GTS100; SD, standard deviation; IOP, intraocular pressure.
![Figure 2 Mean IOP (±SD) for all follow-up visits for both cohorts. *P<0.05 compared with baseline. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at preop and 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the preop, 1 month, and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-Bypass.Abbreviations: CE, cataract extraction; TM-bypass, iStent GTS100; SD, standard deviation; IOP, intraocular pressure.](/cms/asset/feeb4f59-8a73-41c8-81b4-cb0bf6e70514/doph_a_12176474_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Percent mean changes in IOP over time for both cohorts. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 1 month and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass. *P<0.05 comparing the two treatment groups.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TM, trabecular meshwork.
![Figure 3 Percent mean changes in IOP over time for both cohorts. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 1 month and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass. *P<0.05 comparing the two treatment groups.Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TM, trabecular meshwork.](/cms/asset/5f6baabf-6acd-4535-a191-b5f18bb99191/doph_a_12176474_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Treatment success defined as: Proportion of eyes with a reduction of ≥20% from baseline and IOP <18 mmHg with the same or fewer numbers of IOP-lowering medications than preop for both cohorts. N=86 eyes at 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 1 month and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass. *P<0.05 comparing the two treatment groups.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TTM., trabecular meshwork.
![Figure 4 Treatment success defined as: Proportion of eyes with a reduction of ≥20% from baseline and IOP <18 mmHg with the same or fewer numbers of IOP-lowering medications than preop for both cohorts. N=86 eyes at 1 month visit, 75 for the 3 month visit, and 72 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 1 month and 3 month visits, and 94 for the 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass. *P<0.05 comparing the two treatment groups.Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TTM., trabecular meshwork.](/cms/asset/579beaf2-ac54-4738-bd39-6c204607a326/doph_a_12176474_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Mean number of IOP-lowering meds (±SD) for all follow-up visits for both cohorts. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. *P<0.0001 compared with baseline; †P<0.001 between groups. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for CE + TM-bypass.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IOP, intraocular pressure; TM, trabecular meshwork.
![Figure 5 Mean number of IOP-lowering meds (±SD) for all follow-up visits for both cohorts. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. *P<0.0001 compared with baseline; †P<0.001 between groups. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for CE + TM-bypass.Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IOP, intraocular pressure; TM, trabecular meshwork.](/cms/asset/ad0d771d-455f-4242-9be5-356536ad09c9/doph_a_12176474_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Proportion of eyes on no IOP-lowering medications. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at 3 month and 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 3 month and 6 month visits for CE + TM-bypass. TM-bypass = iStent GTS100. *P<0.001 comparing the two treatment groups.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TM, trabecular meshwork.
![Figure 6 Proportion of eyes on no IOP-lowering medications. Patients were kept on their preop IOP-lowering medication regimens until after their 1-month IOP assessment. N=86 eyes at 3 month and 6 month visit for CE + TM-bypass + canaloplasty; N=100 eyes for the 3 month and 6 month visits for CE + TM-bypass. TM-bypass = iStent GTS100. *P<0.001 comparing the two treatment groups.Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; CE, cataract extraction; TM, trabecular meshwork.](/cms/asset/1fd5dafc-e2e8-472c-9c7d-c18cad15b4f8/doph_a_12176474_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 2 Adverse events