400
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 2339-2351 | Published online: 20 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 Johnson and Johnson Tecnis Symfony.

Figure 1 Johnson and Johnson Tecnis Symfony.

Figure 2 AcuFocus IC-8.

Figure 2 AcuFocus IC-8.

Figure 3 Medicem WIOL.

Figure 3 Medicem WIOL.

Table 1 Subject Demographics and Preoperative Profile (logMAR Visual Acuity, Refraction and Biometric Data)

Table 2 Postoperative Manifest Refraction on Study Visit

Table 3 Uncorrected Postoperative Visual Acuity on Study Visit (logMAR)

Table 4 Best-corrected Postoperative Visual Acuity on Study Visit (logMAR)

Figure 4 Monocular defocus curves.

Figure 4 Monocular defocus curves.

Figure 5 Binocular defocus curves.

Figure 5 Binocular defocus curves.

Table 5 Postoperative Aberrations on Study Visit

Figure 6 Mesopic contrast sensitivity without glare (A) and with glare (B).

Figure 6 Mesopic contrast sensitivity without glare (A) and with glare (B).

Figure 7 Modulation transfer function (average height).

Figure 7 Modulation transfer function (average height).

Figure 8 Strehl ratio (point-spread function).

Figure 8 Strehl ratio (point-spread function).

Figure 9 Visual Strehl optical transfer function (VSOTF).

Figure 9 Visual Strehl optical transfer function (VSOTF).

Figure 10 Monocular glarometer scores (A) and binocular glarometer scores (B).

Figure 10 Monocular glarometer scores (A) and binocular glarometer scores (B).

Table 6 Spectacle Dependence and Photic Symptoms (Questionnaire)

Figure 11 Visual satisfaction scores (far, intermediate, and near vision).

Figure 11 Visual satisfaction scores (far, intermediate, and near vision).