145
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Repeatability of OCT-Based versus Scheimpflug- and Reflection-Based Keratometry in Patients with Hyperosmolar and Normal Tear Film

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 3991-4003 | Published online: 18 Nov 2020

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographics, Osmolarity and Keratometry by Osmolarity Group

Table 2 Mean Absolute Difference and Standard Deviation Between Repeated Measurements of (A) Average K and (B) Astigmatism

Figure 1 Absolute difference of repeated measurements of (A) average SimK and TCP and (B) average PCP.

Notes: aWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Lenstar; bWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Pentacam; cHolm–Bonferroni adjusted p (12 comparisons). *Statistically significant.
Abbreviations: Difference, absolute difference of repeated measurements; Avg, average; SimK, simulated keratometry; TCP, total corneal power; PCP, posterior corneal power; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1 Absolute difference of repeated measurements of (A) average SimK and TCP and (B) average PCP.

Figure 2 Percentage of subjects with (A) average K differences and (B) vector differences greater than certain values.

Notes: aFisher exact test comparison with the Pentacam; bthe Anterion compared with corresponding data from the Pentacam. *Statistically significant.
Abbreviations: Avg, average; SimK, simulated keratometry; PCP, posterior corneal power; TCP, total corneal power; diff, absolute difference in average K; Ast. diff, magnitude of vector difference of astigmatism.
Figure 2 Percentage of subjects with (A) average K differences and (B) vector differences greater than certain values.

Figure 3 Difference of repeated measurements of (A) SimK and TCP vector astigmatism and (B) PCP vector astigmatism.

Notes: aWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Lenstar; bWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Pentacam; cHolm–Bonferroni adjusted p (12 comparisons). *Statistically significant.
Abbreviations: Difference, absolute difference of repeated measurements; SimK, simulated keratometry; TCP, total corneal power; PCP, posterior corneal power; Vector Ast., magnitude of vector difference of astigmatism; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3 Difference of repeated measurements of (A) SimK and TCP vector astigmatism and (B) PCP vector astigmatism.

Table 3 Coefficient of Repeatability

Figure 4 Difference of repeated measurements of (A) average keratometry and (B) vector difference of astigmatism with all subjects.

Notes: aWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Lenstar; bWilcoxon signed-rank test comparison with the Pentacam; cHolm–Bonferroni adjusted p (six comparisons). *Statistically significant.
Abbreviations: Difference, absolute difference of repeated measurements; SimK, simulated keratometry; TCP, total corneal power; PCP, posterior corneal power; Avg, average; Vector Ast, magnitude of vector difference of astigmatism; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 4 Difference of repeated measurements of (A) average keratometry and (B) vector difference of astigmatism with all subjects.

Figure 5 Coefficient of repeatability for each instrument with all subjects.

Abbreviations: SimK, simulated keratometry; TCP, total corneal power; PCP, posterior corneal power; Avg, average; Ast., magnitude of vector difference of astigmatism.
Figure 5 Coefficient of repeatability for each instrument with all subjects.