243
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Correlation Between Myopic Refractive Error, Corneal Power and Central Corneal Thickness in the Egyptian Population

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1557-1566 | Published online: 19 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Table 1 Statistical Values of Refractive Errors and Corneal Parameters

Table 2 Comparison of Patients’ Data Between Two Age Groups

Table 3 Comparison Between Data of Males and Females

Table 4 Correlation Value Between Different Parameters

Figure 1 Correlation between spherical equivalent in absolute value and average K showing a statistically significant but weak positive correlation (r = 0.136, p-value <0.001).

Figure 1 Correlation between spherical equivalent in absolute value and average K showing a statistically significant but weak positive correlation (r = 0.136, p-value <0.001).

Figure 2 Correlation between average k and central corneal thickness showing a statistically significant but weak negative correlation (r = −0.089, p-value = 0.001).

Figure 2 Correlation between average k and central corneal thickness showing a statistically significant but weak negative correlation (r = −0.089, p-value = 0.001).

Figure 3 Correlation between absolute value of keratometric and refractive astigmatism showing a statistically significant strong positive correlation (r = 0.651, p-value <0.001).

Figure 3 Correlation between absolute value of keratometric and refractive astigmatism showing a statistically significant strong positive correlation (r = 0.651, p-value <0.001).

Figure 4 Correlation between age and central corneal thickness showing a statistically significant but weak negative correlation (r = −0.094, p-value <0.001).

Figure 4 Correlation between age and central corneal thickness showing a statistically significant but weak negative correlation (r = −0.094, p-value <0.001).