252
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Reproxalap Improves Signs and Symptoms of Allergic Conjunctivitis in an Allergen Chamber: A Real-World Model of Allergen Exposure

, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 15-23 | Published online: 04 Jan 2022

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline Demographic Characteristics

Figure 1 Patient disposition. Sequence A = 0.25% reproxalap, 0.5% reproxalap, and vehicle; sequence B = 0.5% reproxalap, vehicle, and 0.25% reproxalap; sequence C = vehicle, 0.25% reproxalap, and 0.5% reproxalap.

Figure 1 Patient disposition. Sequence A = 0.25% reproxalap, 0.5% reproxalap, and vehicle; sequence B = 0.5% reproxalap, vehicle, and 0.25% reproxalap; sequence C = vehicle, 0.25% reproxalap, and 0.5% reproxalap.

Figure 2 Patient-reported ocular itching score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 2 Patient-reported ocular itching score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 3 Patient-reported ocular tearing score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 3 Patient-reported ocular tearing score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 4 Investigator-assessed conjunctival redness score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 4 Investigator-assessed conjunctival redness score. P values derived from mixed effect models for repeated measures analysis of change from baseline (just prior to chamber entry) over all time points in aggregate.

Figure 5 Time to patient-reported ocular itching score of ≥2 for 0.25% reproxalap versus vehicle. P value derived from log-rank analysis.

Figure 5 Time to patient-reported ocular itching score of ≥2 for 0.25% reproxalap versus vehicle. P value derived from log-rank analysis.

Figure 6 Time to investigator-assessed conjunctival redness score of ≥2 for 0.25% reproxalap versus vehicle. P value derived from log-rank analysis.

Figure 6 Time to investigator-assessed conjunctival redness score of ≥2 for 0.25% reproxalap versus vehicle. P value derived from log-rank analysis.