Figures & data
Figure 1 Scatter plot of attempted versus achieved correction of manifest refraction spherical equivalent, demonstrating the full range of refractive correction.
![Figure 1 Scatter plot of attempted versus achieved correction of manifest refraction spherical equivalent, demonstrating the full range of refractive correction.](/cms/asset/40f6736f-be30-47d3-a686-b71fd387bae3/doph_a_369467_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Preoperative Characteristics
Figure 2 Accuracy of spherical equivalent refractive correction at Month 6. 90.5% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 98.9% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia.
![Figure 2 Accuracy of spherical equivalent refractive correction at Month 6. 90.5% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 98.9% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia.](/cms/asset/b84fddb2-660d-43fd-a14c-722a2f34280c/doph_a_369467_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 The stability of the spherical equivalent refraction from Month 1 to Month 6 is demonstrated in the consistent cohort of 617 eyes with data at all time points.
![Figure 3 The stability of the spherical equivalent refraction from Month 1 to Month 6 is demonstrated in the consistent cohort of 617 eyes with data at all time points.](/cms/asset/5f893a4f-c154-4512-95cc-5e6ee242aaf3/doph_a_369467_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of uncorrected visual acuity at Month 6. All visual acuity testing was performed using an ETDRS chart and values were converted from logMAR to Snellen.
![Figure 4 Frequency distribution of uncorrected visual acuity at Month 6. All visual acuity testing was performed using an ETDRS chart and values were converted from logMAR to Snellen.](/cms/asset/1e3346e7-87a1-4b52-8ff3-59365528257b/doph_a_369467_f0004_b.jpg)