Figures & data
Figure 1 The primary duet IOL implantation approach. A sulcus-based multifocal IOL (1stQ AddOn A4DW0M) on top of a monofocal capsular-bag IOL (Bi-Flex 677). Reproduced with permission from Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd.
![Figure 1 The primary duet IOL implantation approach. A sulcus-based multifocal IOL (1stQ AddOn A4DW0M) on top of a monofocal capsular-bag IOL (Bi-Flex 677). Reproduced with permission from Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd.](/cms/asset/9330c148-f1ff-4bf3-b282-75755b3afde2/doph_a_12154902_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Comparison of postoperative 1-month uncorrected visual acuities in the two study groups. For (A) distance and (B) near. UDVA LogMAR 0.00: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.1522; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.6447 (not significant). UNVA LogMAR 0.20: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.1248; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p ≤ 0.9999 (not significant).
![Figure 2 Comparison of postoperative 1-month uncorrected visual acuities in the two study groups. For (A) distance and (B) near. UDVA LogMAR 0.00: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.1522; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.6447 (not significant). UNVA LogMAR 0.20: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.1248; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p ≤ 0.9999 (not significant).](/cms/asset/42adde6b-0c8b-4156-8bb6-004e88a08b88/doph_a_12154902_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Comparison of postoperative 1-year uncorrected visual acuities in the two study groups. For (A) distance and (B) near. UDVA LogMAR 0.00: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.4926; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.3648 (not significant). UNVA LogMAR 0.20: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.2738; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.9654 (not significant).
![Figure 3 Comparison of postoperative 1-year uncorrected visual acuities in the two study groups. For (A) distance and (B) near. UDVA LogMAR 0.00: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.4926; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.3648 (not significant). UNVA LogMAR 0.20: Mann–Whitney test p = 0.2738; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test p = 0.9654 (not significant).](/cms/asset/abe0d5a1-2f27-4cff-a5c9-c66bd420ce3e/doph_a_12154902_f0003_c.jpg)