Figures & data
Table 1 Pre and Postoperative Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Data in the studied population
Table 2 Cases with Intense Keratometric Flattening Effect
Figure 1 Pre- and post-operative steeper keratometry (A), flatter keratometry (B) and Pre- and post-operative spherical equivalent (C).
![Figure 1 Pre- and post-operative steeper keratometry (A), flatter keratometry (B) and Pre- and post-operative spherical equivalent (C).](/cms/asset/4767f93f-c03a-4db9-9b75-cc2016d92805/doph_a_12158753_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Top: preoperative Scheimpflug analysis; Bottom: 13 years postoperative Scheimpflug analysis of the case presenting an extreme flattening of 11.5D in the steeper keratometry.
![Figure 2 Top: preoperative Scheimpflug analysis; Bottom: 13 years postoperative Scheimpflug analysis of the case presenting an extreme flattening of 11.5D in the steeper keratometry.](/cms/asset/b79e4dcc-5860-4d21-923b-ba607c555726/doph_a_12158753_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 (A) Postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of the case presenting an extreme flattening of 11.5D in the steeper keratometry; (B) Pentacam densitometric values of the same patient.
![Figure 3 (A) Postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of the case presenting an extreme flattening of 11.5D in the steeper keratometry; (B) Pentacam densitometric values of the same patient.](/cms/asset/20041fb1-6149-4f9a-b4ec-ed45c22f885d/doph_a_12158753_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3 Corneal Densitometry Measurements at 10 Years or More After CXL