Figures & data
Figure 1 The Alcon/WaveLight® FS200 patient interfaces 1504 (metal and glass, top) and 1505 (clear cone, bottom).
![Figure 1 The Alcon/WaveLight® FS200 patient interfaces 1504 (metal and glass, top) and 1505 (clear cone, bottom).](/cms/asset/25ceb79d-7435-432b-9341-9b4f8cc5740c/doph_a_43396_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Intended diameters of the flaps studied comparing the two groups
Figure 2 Measurement of flap thickness from the high-resolution meridional scan provided by the anterior-segment optical coherence tomography system.
![Figure 2 Measurement of flap thickness from the high-resolution meridional scan provided by the anterior-segment optical coherence tomography system.](/cms/asset/ba0aaf6f-7cce-4190-88ae-c1bc9834a93f/doph_a_43396_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Flap diameter predictability using the clear cone interface 1505.
![Figure 3 Flap diameter predictability using the clear cone interface 1505.](/cms/asset/11c54636-b270-451a-addb-fff7e059d58c/doph_a_43396_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Flap thickness predictability using the clear cone interface 1505.
![Figure 4 Flap thickness predictability using the clear cone interface 1505.](/cms/asset/85502943-0cc7-43ea-a770-974268ebf246/doph_a_43396_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 2 Measured (via anterior-segment optical coherence tomography imaging) versus programmed flap thickness, as obtained using the clear cone interface