294
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Time Savings Using a Digital Workflow versus a Conventional for Intraocular Lens Implantation in a Corporate Chain Hospital Setting

, , &
Pages 113-119 | Received 13 Sep 2023, Accepted 15 Dec 2023, Published online: 11 Jan 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1 Time assessments for digital cataract workflow and existing conventional workflow. *Time 1 was calculated as the sum of the mean times recorded for each step: (IOL Master) + (Pentacam) + (OCT) + (endothelial cell count). **Time 3: Digital transfer step not applicable in digital cataract workflow as it is automated. #Times 4 and 5: IOL axis marking is not applicable in the digital cataract workflow as it is done via the FORUM® platform/CALLISTO eye.

Abbreviations: IOL, intraocular lens; OR, operating room.
Figure 1 Time assessments for digital cataract workflow and existing conventional workflow. *Time 1 was calculated as the sum of the mean times recorded for each step: (IOL Master) + (Pentacam) + (OCT) + (endothelial cell count). **Time 3: Digital transfer step not applicable in digital cataract workflow as it is automated. #Times 4 and 5: IOL axis marking is not applicable in the digital cataract workflow as it is done via the FORUM® platform/CALLISTO eye.

Table 1 Time Measurements at Various Steps in Site’s Existing Conventional and Digital Cataract Workflow

Figure 2 Inter observer variability in the digital cataract workflow versus existing conventional workflow for preoperative assessments.

Figure 2 Inter observer variability in the digital cataract workflow versus existing conventional workflow for preoperative assessments.

Figure 3 Overall time savings in digital cataract workflow versus existing conventional workflow.

Abbreviation: IOL, intraocular.
Figure 3 Overall time savings in digital cataract workflow versus existing conventional workflow.