Figures & data
Table 1 Patient characteristics and methodologic summary of four open studies of Hylabak® in patients with dry eye syndrome
Table 2 Etiology of dry eye syndrome in each study
Figure 1 Change in subjective discomfort score during 28 days of treatment with Hylabak® in (A) postmenopausal women, (B) patients with persistent meibomian blepharitis, and (C) Sjögren’s syndrome (n=32)Citation25 compared with a similar group of patients treated with Tear Naturale® (n=25).Citation28
![Figure 1 Change in subjective discomfort score during 28 days of treatment with Hylabak® in (A) postmenopausal women, (B) patients with persistent meibomian blepharitis, and (C) Sjögren’s syndrome (n=32)Citation25 compared with a similar group of patients treated with Tear Naturale® (n=25).Citation28](/cms/asset/4cef6dde-20bb-4cca-b422-e0474a372a26/doph_a_47713_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Change in objective signs score during 28 days of treatment with Hylabak® in (A) postmenopausal women, (B) patients with persistent meibomian blepharitis, and (C) Sjögren’s syndrome (n=32)Citation25 compared with a similar group of patients treated with Tear Naturale® (n=25).Citation28
![Figure 2 Change in objective signs score during 28 days of treatment with Hylabak® in (A) postmenopausal women, (B) patients with persistent meibomian blepharitis, and (C) Sjögren’s syndrome (n=32)Citation25 compared with a similar group of patients treated with Tear Naturale® (n=25).Citation28](/cms/asset/c530e620-1a8a-4680-b955-d251f10ea021/doph_a_47713_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Change in subjective signs and symptoms score during 2 weeks of treatment with Hylabak® in office workers with (A) mild or (B) moderate symptoms (n=32).Citation26
![Figure 3 Change in subjective signs and symptoms score during 2 weeks of treatment with Hylabak® in office workers with (A) mild or (B) moderate symptoms (n=32).Citation26](/cms/asset/b55ef86b-b794-4f50-8b5e-3acab8edbbd5/doph_a_47713_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Change in number of patients with subjective complaints during 2 months of treatment with Hylabak® in children and adolescents wearing soft contact lenses (n=20).Citation27
![Figure 4 Change in number of patients with subjective complaints during 2 months of treatment with Hylabak® in children and adolescents wearing soft contact lenses (n=20).Citation27](/cms/asset/d95ed83e-4d5e-48ba-b41f-51ec3a3cd150/doph_a_47713_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3 Results of functional tests (Schirmer’s test and Norn’s test) performed in all four studies