64
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Other

Comparison of the nerve fiber layer of type 2 diabetic patients without glaucoma with normal subjects of the same age and sex

, , , , &
Pages 455-463 | Published online: 25 Feb 2014

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic features of enrolled subjects

Table 2 GDx VCC parameters of enrolled subjects

Table 3 Percentage and cumulative percentage explained by each factor (R-mode) for normal, no retinopathy, and with retinopathy groups

Figure 1 Varimax rotated factor loadings for the normal group of the four factors. NFI shows negative correlation with TSNIT, superior and inferior average, as it is expected, and shows no relation with other ocular parameters, such as CCT and normal IO.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; C/D, cup to disc; F1, first factor; F2, second factor; F3, third factor; F4, fourth factor; IOP, intraocular pressure; NFI, nerve fiber indicator; SD, standard deviation; TSNIT, temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal.
Figure 1 Varimax rotated factor loadings for the normal group of the four factors. NFI shows negative correlation with TSNIT, superior and inferior average, as it is expected, and shows no relation with other ocular parameters, such as CCT and normal IO.

Figure 2 Varimax rotated factor loadings for the “no retinopathy” group of the four factors (A). Varimax rotated factor loadings for the “with mild retinopathy” group of the four factors (B). The results for F1 of the mild retinopathy group are similar to F1 of the normal group analysis and resample those of the “no retinopathy” group.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; C/D, cup to disc; F1, first factor; F2, second factor; F3, third factor; F4, fourth factor; IOP, intraocular pressure; NFI, nerve fiber indicator; SD, standard deviation; TSNIT, temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal; Yod, years of diabetes.
Figure 2 Varimax rotated factor loadings for the “no retinopathy” group of the four factors (A). Varimax rotated factor loadings for the “with mild retinopathy” group of the four factors (B). The results for F1 of the mild retinopathy group are similar to F1 of the normal group analysis and resample those of the “no retinopathy” group.