Figures & data
Table 1 Subject accountability
Table 2 Demographics
Figure 3 Proportion of eyes with an M12 IOP reduction ≥50%, ≥40%, ≥30%, and ≥20%, respectively, for the iStent inject eyes without medication versus the two medications group, with a nonresponder assumption for missing data. A between-group difference was significant (P=0.02) at the ≥50% level of IOP reduction.
![Figure 3 Proportion of eyes with an M12 IOP reduction ≥50%, ≥40%, ≥30%, and ≥20%, respectively, for the iStent inject eyes without medication versus the two medications group, with a nonresponder assumption for missing data. A between-group difference was significant (P=0.02) at the ≥50% level of IOP reduction.](/cms/asset/1ac9b424-4092-4e3f-a46e-8c6e134c5fc6/doph_a_59932_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Proportion of eyes with an M12 IOP ≤15 mmHg and ≤18 mmHg, respectively, for the iStent inject eyes without medication versus the two-medications group, with a nonresponder assumption for missing data.
![Figure 4 Proportion of eyes with an M12 IOP ≤15 mmHg and ≤18 mmHg, respectively, for the iStent inject eyes without medication versus the two-medications group, with a nonresponder assumption for missing data.](/cms/asset/1616a6b3-5dd4-461b-9d5f-b5f4458f1eda/doph_a_59932_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 3 Mean intraocular pressure and intraocular pressure change by visit – all eyes
Table 4 Vertical cup-to-disc ratio change from baseline
Table 5 Ocular adverse events and other postoperative observations