Figures & data
Figure 1 Anterior-segment optical coherency high-resolution cross-sectional (6 mm) image of an eye treated with LASIK-CXL for −2.25 D of sphere and −0.25 D of astigmatism, obtained 1-year postoperatively. Blue arrows indicate the LASIK flap, while yellow arrows indicate the stromal hyper-reflection line, which correlates with the depth of the prophylactic cross-linking effect.
![Figure 1 Anterior-segment optical coherency high-resolution cross-sectional (6 mm) image of an eye treated with LASIK-CXL for −2.25 D of sphere and −0.25 D of astigmatism, obtained 1-year postoperatively. Blue arrows indicate the LASIK flap, while yellow arrows indicate the stromal hyper-reflection line, which correlates with the depth of the prophylactic cross-linking effect.](/cms/asset/a23de4c5-b7b7-48a5-baab-c4e247fd71ab/doph_a_68372_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Preoperative demographics, including the planned residual stromal thickness, between the two groups
Figure 2 Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (blue columns) versus preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (red columns) 1-year postoperatively, in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.
![Figure 2 Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (blue columns) versus preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (red columns) 1-year postoperatively, in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.](/cms/asset/cc77f7f9-628d-4c13-bddd-dae7b129e611/doph_a_68372_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Change in corrected visual acuity, as a percentage of eyes with gain/loss in Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity 1-year postoperatively.
![Figure 3 Change in corrected visual acuity, as a percentage of eyes with gain/loss in Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity 1-year postoperatively.](/cms/asset/72e69ec8-81b1-4b7e-9a1b-371c14c0c4b1/doph_a_68372_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Predictability of spherical equivalent correction, measured at 1-year postoperatively, showing achieved spherical equivalent (vertical axis) versus attempted spherical equivalent (horizontal axis), in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.
![Figure 4 Predictability of spherical equivalent correction, measured at 1-year postoperatively, showing achieved spherical equivalent (vertical axis) versus attempted spherical equivalent (horizontal axis), in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.](/cms/asset/739b599b-f6b2-4eeb-acc9-e67e1fba4b75/doph_a_68372_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction for both groups, 1-year postoperatively.
![Figure 5 Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction for both groups, 1-year postoperatively.](/cms/asset/dc898e69-9ebb-45b1-b69f-643742663901/doph_a_68372_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Refractive astigmatism preoperatively (red columns) and 1-year postoperatively (blue columns), in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.
Abbreviations: CXL, cross-linking; LASIK, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
![Figure 6 Refractive astigmatism preoperatively (red columns) and 1-year postoperatively (blue columns), in (A) the LASIK-CXL group and (B) the stand-alone LASIK group.](/cms/asset/8203ad80-4ded-4a57-9cc7-5d060f933cb8/doph_a_68372_f0006_c.jpg)