Figures & data
Table 1 Characteristics of CRC patients treated with surgical resection according to PLR
Figure 1 The graded relationship between increasing number of MetS components and PLR.
![Figure 1 The graded relationship between increasing number of MetS components and PLR.](/cms/asset/bfc03025-e7e2-4dd3-ab2c-bec7cd695fd5/dott_a_132621_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of CRC patients stratified by MetS
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) stratified by PLR in CRC patients (cutoff values 120, 220, respectively).
![Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) stratified by PLR in CRC patients (cutoff values 120, 220, respectively).](/cms/asset/67898219-4b44-4141-8c37-1a6e7a377a04/dott_a_132621_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) stratified by MetS in CRC patients.
![Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) stratified by MetS in CRC patients.](/cms/asset/8ae4c56c-936e-4baa-b16f-f2d3eac7e5c9/dott_a_132621_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3 Cox proportional hazard regression models of risk factors associated with prognosis among CRC patients
Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival stratified by PLR in CRC patients with MetS (A) and overall survival stratified by MetS in CRC patients with PLR >220 (B).
![Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing overall survival stratified by PLR in CRC patients with MetS (A) and overall survival stratified by MetS in CRC patients with PLR >220 (B).](/cms/asset/3f5ac751-ce25-4f4b-8215-225879e31f16/dott_a_132621_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 4 Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of prognosis stratified by MetS
Table 5 Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the prognosis of the subgroups of PLR