Figures & data
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Table 2 Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes with or without orchiectomy
Figure 2 Survival difference between lower and higher quartiles of iPSA.
![Figure 2 Survival difference between lower and higher quartiles of iPSA.](/cms/asset/8d5e453d-0ddf-48eb-8e70-eb919264e6b9/dott_a_12195502_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Dot plot of iPSA in patients who selected treatment options with or without orchiectomy.
![Figure 3 Dot plot of iPSA in patients who selected treatment options with or without orchiectomy.](/cms/asset/0e7cb84b-08fe-4f49-834a-431fc984a9fb/dott_a_12195502_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Survival difference between patient groups that chose treatment options with or without orchiectomy.
![Figure 4 Survival difference between patient groups that chose treatment options with or without orchiectomy.](/cms/asset/eed4baa8-c1ca-4c82-a2f2-f872f1a1ede5/dott_a_12195502_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Survival difference between patient groups who did or did not reach TN following primary androgen deprivation therapy. (denoting nadir PSA value that over 90% of iPSA reduction after primary androgen deprivation therapy).
![Figure 5 Survival difference between patient groups who did or did not reach TN following primary androgen deprivation therapy. (denoting nadir PSA value that over 90% of iPSA reduction after primary androgen deprivation therapy).](/cms/asset/96d49476-63ec-439c-b858-fd3fcb3be93f/dott_a_12195502_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 In patients that reached true nadir PSA, orchiectomy still provided survival advantage in this study cohort.
![Figure 6 In patients that reached true nadir PSA, orchiectomy still provided survival advantage in this study cohort.](/cms/asset/0557d3cb-761c-4aad-bb8f-1c9b7b34e506/dott_a_12195502_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 3 Cox regression analysis